The convergence of different forms of technological inventions has transformed the world especially since 2000 and continues to grow. There are numerous benefits associated with this remarkable convergence. Evaluating the effect of technology in society, it is clear that today technology has become the habitat of man in the modern world, in the office, in shopping malls, on the street and even in domestic places you can barely see people communicating with each other at a distance. the airport waits for seats but is busy checking small gadgets. The main missions, including even very simple ones, are performed by machines. However, the probabilities related to the convergence of technology describe ethical concerns. The consequences have been overwhelming on the lives of humanity (Raab, 2006). The problems have become universal. The main objective of these forms of technology concerns the improvement of human performance in the implementation of tasks. Various areas of convergence include nanotechnology (the influence of substance on an atomic or molecular proportion), biotechnology (including genetic engineering), computer science, and cognitive science (Stair & Reynolds, 2010). The ethical results these concepts have in society are enormous and worth observing. Technological convergences are characterized by relatively high operating costs. This means that access to services in sectors such as nanotechnology has become the prerogative of the rich. This introduces class struggles that mirror Marxist theories. Class struggles raise ethical concerns. Rich countries cannot afford the technological costs and therefore have to do without them (Weckert, 2009). Furthermore, the threat posed to humans by the production of deadly weapons is... half of paper... The resulting class struggles have substantial effects on social interactions, at least between the two groups. In fact, lately most crimes have moved from typical forms to electronic ones. Either you use technology to steal from others or you take away the technological gadgets themselves. It is essential that all people are involved in the development of technology. To the extent that these technologies aim to save lives and improve human performance in life, this widens the gap between rich and poor. This is ethically wrong. For example, nanotechnology increases the life expectancy of wealthy individuals at the expense of those who struggle financially. In general, oversight of these aspects of technology should be entrusted to trusted bodies that ensure that ethics and social perspectives are adequately addressed..