Although humans often fail to realize the repercussions of their actions, every decision inevitably comes with consequences. As pressure for progress in cosmetics, biomedical research, and education increases, methods of acquiring the information needed to meet these demands usually come into conflict with moral, ethical, and personal ideals. For example, the use of animals for research contributes to great controversy. The most pragmatic approach to this dilemma is to support the use of animals in medical experiments if the overall benefits to humanity or the overall benefits to other species exceed a reasonable doubt. However, animals should not be exploited to satisfy the needs of human vanity. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayResearchers have developed numerous treatments to remedy potentially fatal diseases such as hypertension, stroke, heart attack, and heart disease by conducting experiments on animals. According to the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, animals, such as dogs, have had a profound impact on medical innovations. For example, studying the internal organs of dogs has allowed scientists to develop “open-heart surgery, pacemakers and heart transplants,” as well as identify the cause of diabetes. (AALAS) As a result, technological developments such as insulin pumps have replaced injections for diabetics and cardiac procedures have revolutionized therapy for people who have serious heart problems, thus increasing human longevity. Furthermore, animals also have the opportunity to benefit from medical research. By sacrificing the comfort of some cats for the sake of science, researchers have been able to increase their knowledge of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus. (AALAS) Familiarity with these viruses could lead to the production of potent vaccines that prevent fatal infections in cats, 15% of which are infected with one or both of these viruses. (AALAS) Regardless of the cause that justifies the use of animals for research, all species should be treated morally. Furthermore, animals depend on each other for survival on a fundamental level. This aphorism underlines the intrinsic value of all organisms and, due to their value, these animals deserve respect. To preserve the dignity of test subjects, humans must consciously minimize their subjects' distress. Under any circumstances, pain is an intrinsic evil, and the deliberate infliction of pain on another creature is simply morally negligible. Even though they must fulfill moral duties, humans continue to kill approximately “20 million animals every year for the purpose of experimentation.” (Andre and Velasquez) Furthermore, the availability of painkillers means that the approximately eight million animals used in conducting painful experiments should be spared unnecessary restraints. Yet frugal societies and scientific societies choose to test a percentage of these eight million animals without administering painkillers. (André and Velasquez) Since the behavior of some researchers violates ethical values, the use of animals for experiments should be regulated and limits should be placed on the procedures to which these organisms are forced to undergo. For example, animals with “higher cognitive abilities such as chimpanzees should not be used in research.” (Nuffield) Also, product testing.