I am writing to express my thoughts on the welfare of animals with the consumption of meat for humans. In this letter I will discuss my position and present my arguments that will try to convince you that meat consumption is not moral for animals. The letter will be structured and spoken from a philosophical point of view, so some philosophical terminology will be used, which I will define first. Normative ethical frameworks are the three perspectives that judge morality. First, deontology examines the duty of action. Judge morality by what is done. Next, utilitarianism focuses on the overall happiness of the situation. Finally, virtue ethics examines the character of a person's decision to determine goodness. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay First, killing an animal for the consumption and enjoyment of humans is not moral from an animal rights perspective. This is based on deontology, since using something as a means to an end means that the “something” is used to achieve the desired result for the party using it, but the “something” does not benefit from it. This is considered unethical, because one party benefits, while the other does not, making it unfair. To illustrate this, we can use premises and conclusions to demonstrate a logical thinking process. Premise 1: All creatures who can suffer should have the right to live. Premise 2: Animals can suffer and feel pain. Conclusion: animals have the right to live. Now, the reason animals have this "right" to live is that they can sense pain and loss. Jeremy Bentham is the founder of the reform utilitarian school of moral philosophy and stated that “The question is not 'Can they reason?' nor "Can they talk?" but 'Can they suffer?'” He argues that the capacity to suffer entitles one to equal consideration with others who can. All animals can suffer to the same extent as humans. Secondly, ending an animal's life means denying animals their interests. Animals, like all living creatures, have interests. The term “interests” refers to the aspects of life they wish to experience and undergo. "Aussie Abattoirs", part of the Aussie Farms Repository, is an organization that fights animal slaughter. They report data showing how much an animal's life is shortened when it is raised for meat. In the most extreme case, male chicks are killed within one day of birth in the egg industry, which is 2,920 times less than their natural lifespan of 8 years. Other animals have an average lifespan 60 times shorter than their wild lifespan. Ending life prematurely is immoral, but the way it is done is worse. Furthermore, animals are not taken into consideration for their well-being. Animals are subjected to inhumane conditions when raised in factories. A documentary called "Farm to Fridge" showed behind the scenes of factory farming and the appalling conditions the animals were subjected to. Animals were tortured, forcibly controlled and brutally handled. It is unethical to treat animals this way, and since slaughtering animals with their meat is immoral, there is no need to cause them this harm, on top of already having to involuntarily give up their life. From a deontological point of view, animals are essentially tortured and subjected to inhuman, therefore non-moral conditions. From one perspective,?”.