The quote "We are drowning in information but we are hungry for knowledge" by John Naisbitt seems to refer to the problem of the quality of knowledge, since some knowledge statements tend to lack quality. What the quote purports to mean is how one can separate the quality of information from the quantity of information provided and then accept it, is quite relevant to the title. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayThe title provided expresses that having more or fewer people accepting a certain knowledge is the most effective way to measure the quality of that particular piece of knowledge. Measuring the quality of knowledge by the number of people who accept it is a statement I would stand by, however there are occasions when it is not the best way to measure the quality of the knowledge produced. The main focus of the essay, which is Knowledge, has many definitions in general. The philosopher Plato defined knowledge as “true and justified belief,” which is a plausible definition for both philosophers and individuals. This is directly related to the quality of knowledge where by quality can be defined as; the standard of something or an attribute as opposed to something of the same kind. I will first address how to measure the quality of knowledge and then continue to discuss whether the quantity of people accepting a knowledge claim would indicate the quality of the knowledge claim. And therefore, it is more important to address the following question about knowledge to justify the arguments: “How can we measure the quality of knowledge?” It is quite important to know what steps to take to find out whether a piece of knowledge is of high or low quality before accepting that particular piece of knowledge. There are many ways to measure the quality of knowledge, but you need to consider the claim, accessibility and verifiability of knowledge claims are what determine the quality of knowledge. For example, in biology, oxygen is believed to be produced by green plants as they absorb the carbon dioxide we release. This part of knowledge is accepted by a large number of individuals as "accessible". This knowledge is available in books and the internet which are two of the major sources of knowledge and hence, an individual can accept it through deductive reasoning as there are numerous sources accessible to the individual. Recently, I conducted an experiment for my internal ESS evaluation that measured how many oxygen bubbles the Elodea system produces per minute with different water ph levels. Through this experiment I was able to "verify" that green plants also produce oxygen in water through sensory perception (sight) and compare the results with existing knowledge on the same type of experiment. Therefore, if knowledge is accessible and verifiable, it is of high quality. On the other hand, knowledge reliability shows that the knowledge is of high quality. George Orwell's book 1984 seems to be a very relevant example to support this counterclaim as a work of art. In 1984 Orwell describes a totalitarian country neglected by Big Brother and "his party". The protagonist, Winston Smith, is one of the few who are against the unhappy party and has an ideology different from that of the party. Winston is said to work in the documentation department of the Ministry of Truth, and his job is to rewrite historical articles and newspapers to resonate with what the fickle party says in the present. The things that thereprovide/inform about accessible knowledge do not seem to be as reliable as we think, this problem is also relevant in today's world with all the mass media at our disposal. There are many episodes within the book that talk about this topic, especially in chapter 7, where Winston talks about a children's book from the past, various statements given by the party and the three individuals. “Everything disappeared into the fog. The past has been erased, the erasure has been forgotten, the lie has become truth” is a quote to remember because it was what the party was doing. The most significant incident occurs when Winston recalls a meeting with three men, Jones, Aaronson and Rutherford who had confessed to old crimes as well as new ones and were supposedly executed in 1968. According to Winston's memory, after 5 years, in 1973, Winston he had discovered a photo of a party where the men were present and named. Therefore, he concluded “the confessions were lies”. It can be concluded that the reliability of knowledge plays a huge role in determining its quality through various ways of knowing such as Memory which brings me to the KQ answer, there are many ways to measure the quality of knowledge including how many people accept it but should also consider its availability, verifiability and reliability since these are the factors that determine the quality of knowledge and therefore measure the quality of knowledge by the number of people who accept it. This raises another knowledge question; To what extent would people's acceptance of knowledge claims indicate their quality? Since quality can be measured in various ways (but there are some that should be used), people's acceptance of knowledge claims also has an impact on the quality of knowledge. knowledge. In some cases, the quality of knowledge is indicated by the number of individuals who accept it. Art can be defined as an expression of human creative ability to produce a certain work, and therefore music is an art form. American rapper J. Cole recently released an album titled KOD that addresses addiction, racism, and other social issues that have impacted or are impacting Cole and the millennial generation that Cole targets. Album stands for the following; Kids On Drugs, King Over Dosed and Kill Our Demons which are the social and personal issues that inspired Cole's work; the first refers to the popularity of drug use among today's young generations, the second refers to J. Cole himself and his experience with drugs and finally the third, which indicates society's ultimate goal of addressing the own fears. These are the few reasons why Cole's work is of high quality. Since Cole does not have a huge fan base compared to other artists like Drake, his album broke various records and was nominated for "Album of the Year". prizes. Cole shares what he has observed and felt throughout his life and uses emotion, reasoning, language, memory and sensory perception to create his work of art that appeals to his audience and therefore is able to convey his messages to them. Since his work relates to many social and personal issues, many people are able to relate to his message and understand his expressions and thus give credibility to his work and in this way define its quality. It is thanks to the acceptance of many people that Cole's project achieved its success, despite the competition from other famous artists. However, a significant counterclaim is that in some cases, people tend to believe hypothetical statements that are not of high quality. With the.