Since its invention, it becomes one of the most important tools we use in our daily lives, currently, more than 47% of the world's population, 3.2 billion people, use the Internet (Money). The purpose of net neutrality laws is to ensure that no Internet Service Provider (ISP) has the ability to tamper with a person's connection to a website in any way (Business Insider). This has recently started to crop up on social media and has once again become a widely debated topic. Net neutrality laws were first addressed during the Obama presidency in 2015, when tougher laws were put in place to regulate ISPs (The Guardian). Recently, on December 14, 2017, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) successfully repealed these laws. In this essay I will discuss the opinions of 3 different stakeholders Ajit Pai, Mignon Clyburn and the Singapore government. I will focus more on the ethical and ideological perspective of these stakeholders. One of the most significant stakeholders in this issue is Ajit Pai, the current chairman of the FCC, who takes an ideologically conservative stance in advocating the repeal of Title II net neutrality laws. Ajit Pai was first appointed to work in the FCC in 2012 during the Obama presidency in a Republican party position, but recently elected chairman of the FCC following the election of Trump (Wikipedia). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay A conservative ideology is one that wants less government involvement in daily life and business, as well as being in favor of more traditional views. includes private companies. ISPs are also actually private companies because they are not controlled by the government. By repealing Title II's strict net neutrality laws, they would return more power to ISPs and loosen government control, further supporting conservative ideology. But this is not the only perspective through which we can analyze Ajit Pai. He is advocating for the repeal of net neutrality, which also demonstrates a utilitarian ethic. His main reason for repealing net neutrality is that he believes in the greater good of people and that more people would benefit from it. In an interview, he said the strikers' current net neutrality laws could "disincentivize companies from wanting to build Internet access in many parts of the country, such as in low-income, urban and rural areas." (PBS). Utilitarian ethics is the belief that every person has equal value and that every action aims for the greatest overall happiness. Ajit Pai believes that in this way it will be possible to achieve a freer and more open Internet (PBS), benefiting the entire country and demonstrating this utilitarian ethic. If Ajit succeeds in repealing net neutrality, it would revert Title II net neutrality laws to Title I laws. This does not stop ISPs from tampering with Internet connections and data if possible. For example, an ISP may intentionally slow down your Internet connection to sell you a deal to pay more for a faster Internet connection. This act of repealing net neutrality has also led the general public to have extremely negative opinions on this issue and to oppose the repeal. The second stakeholder I will analyze is FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn, a Democrat who has an ideologically socialist view on repealing net neutrality and is.