The difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution is that the Articles of Confederation lasted from 1776 to 1789. They were also replaced by a more informed government that gave them power for the federal government. They were debt poor because Congress might not be able to pay state taxes. Furthermore, they had no federal court, no trade tariffs, no executive power, and states had to provide a military where groups could not. The reason why in the Articles of Confederation, which were poor because the federal government was what you call a week to have strict laws where it made Congress want to have a revolutionary war so that they could be able to pay back their debt they might not repay. “Because it had no specific taxing power, all those proposals were rejected.” It also brought up the point why they couldn't pay it all back because the Articles of Confederation didn't provide for federal courts and it all depended on the states' ability to do their share of the work to make the decisions, not us. It was difficult then because the rights could not be changed; made it difficult for the Articles of Confederation to “provide the power to tax and too untested a national government.” So, essentially, they had no power to do anything and the states made their own decisions. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay On the other hand, the Constitution had almost all the rights they could get because they could do what they wanted and what made them entire lives become better for the whole community. They were able to provide a judicial system, they had the right to impose taxes, they could raise an army, and they only needed fifty percent, a house and signature votes from the president to pass laws and then articles of the Confederacy that required nearly sixty-nine percent of the legislature approved the ability to pass laws where it was more difficult. There are three constitutions that are divided into three branches: the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, and "the separation of powers is simply a way of apportioning power among the three branches of government." Checks and balance are important because it helps companies grow and make sure everything goes well with their business from start to finish. The legislative branch and the executive branch are that the legislative branch can pass laws and be able to enact provisions and amend them. On the other hand, the executive can “refuse to confirm appointments or approve treaties; override the presidents by a two-thirds vote.” The book states that the executive has the right to revoke the laws of the United States. Help the president not do anything wrong because the president can do wrong things and that's okay. In the judicial vs executive case, the head of the judiciary can declare justice on impeachment trials, while the executive can appoint federal judges to not impeach the decision. The managers are the ones who support it and say they don't want the process and let the process not continue no matter what happened in their (personal) situation. Also, in the legislative branch, they can declare war because in Article 1, Congress has the right to declare only if the United States has a war on its hands. Also, in the legislative branch, you are not allowed to disrupt the house for more than three days if one of the other houses allows it. Please note: this is just an example. Get a customized document from our writers now.