Topic > Why massacres became yesterday's news while funny topics take center stage

More than 6,700 people died in the world's latest humanitarian crisis in 2018. From political debates to questions about UN involvement, the Rohingya crisis has become the cause of much discussion. Thousands of news networks covered updates from channels around the world. However, after a few months, the media reduced coverage on the topic, looking for another attractive sensation. The massacres and brutality seemed to fade from people's minds as they began to focus on more entertaining topics. Eventually, many began to wonder whether repeated screening for violence might play a role in how people react to inhumane things. Due to the constant fueling of violence and decreased responsiveness to alerts, people desensitize to humanitarian issues. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayNetflix, TV shows, and social media are just one of the many diversions people consume today. The outlets as such provide distractions to viewers all over the world at any time of the day. Although they facilitate communication, the media undoubtedly has imminent changes in people's minds and behavior. When observing horrific activities, reactions such as fear, alarm, and disgust should presumably be common in people. However, studies show that the more violent images become constant in an individual's daily entertainment, the less they respond to the brain's alarm stimuli. Many psychologists predict that frequent “violent media exposure [could] contribute to a blunted response.” Large shootings, massacres, or gang brutality will appear as a common occurrence indicating the severity of a situation for such individuals. Unknowingly, emotion-transmitting parts of the brain such as the amyglanda will begin to absorb entertainment as a stimulus, consequently undermining real-life events. In a 2010 study of media exposure conducted by psychologist Laura Stockdale, 25 participants were repeatedly shown either a normal or violent movie and asked to complete a gender discrimination task using faces. The results concluded that constant viewing leads to suppression of “implicit emotional processing.” Stockdale's observations describe a specific situation that a group of people had to endure after being constantly subjected to various violent films. With each repetition of the screening, participants' ratings changed from less critical to dismissive. The study also suggested a notable decrease in stimulation of the prefrontal cortex, the analyzing part of the human brain. Similarly, another study was conducted by researchers using violent films with similar concepts. Participants were asked to watch nine violent and comical scenes and then ask which scenes or victims they felt worried about. The experiment concluded that gradually, the feeling of liking towards the film's characters decreased as “significant effects were found for participants' first reports of liking.” The study's growth model produced a curvilinear pattern representing a decrease in participants' startle responses to victim deaths. Evidently, this demonstrates that the continuous representation of any activity leads the brain to accommodate it over time. People over time become accustomed to such events and in a sense crave possible distractions in other media or refuse to recognize the.