Euthanasia means ending the life of a seriously ill individual to save him from the pain and suffering that the disease is causing. Euthanasia is known in other terms as assisted suicide and embodies the same principles as murder. It is usually only performed on an individual with an incurable condition, on the other hand, there are other occasions when it can be conducted. In many countries, such as the United Kingdom, it is illegal to help someone end their life. Should patients who are terminally ill and in great pain be helped to end their life, in case the patient wishes it? After all, who has the freedom to repudiate any patient who is suffering a lot of pain and a less atrocious death? These questions generate a tremendous amount of discussion and have been intensely debated. Those in favor of euthanasia argue that the patient's wishes must be respected, while those against argue that the procedure could be abused, leading to distressing situations. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Human beings are mortal and their life cycle is fixed. Although we are temporary, human beings try to hold on to their lives as much as possible; the anguish of dying and the desire to constantly stay alive are part of human nature. Sometimes, though, the medical field takes advantage of this phase of humanity. While it is correct that one of the goals of medicine is to extend life, the additional goal is to relieve pain and misery (Engdahl). Christians who usually oppose this act believe that man was created in the likeness and image of God, therefore they have a key value or value, beyond any price. Almost all Christian and pro-life views are based on personal dignity. The act of euthanasia can have a moral logic if it is imaginable to say, honorably, that this self-esteem has disappeared. To commit euthanasia is to act with the specific intention that someone be a nobody. This is the central error of all wickedness in human associations. To perform a euthanasia procedure on any human being is to fail to notice the individual's basic worth or self-worth. The ruling that everything of value is fundamentally somehow worthless is morally and logically wrong. The morality of the act of euthanasia centers on dualistic anthropology and the flawed moral assumptions fundamental to the justification of euthanasia, called consequentialism (Engdahl). The fundamental claim of supporters of this act's beliefs is that human beings are deliberately sensitive subjects, whose self-esteem involves the ability to make decisions and define their own destiny. The natural life of the body is a form of personal life since without bodily life the individual cannot be a thing that experiences in a determinate way. This means that the bodily life of a human being is dissimilar to personal life. Therefore, the human body and its bodily lifespan are contributory goods, goods for that particular person, not property of the individual. It follows that there may be a belief that it is not worth staying alive, an individual is unable to make decisions, that bodily life is burdensome or useless, and in situations where it becomes useless, the individual, i.e. consciously feeling matter has the freedom to free itself from this inoperable burden. Currently, an important issue in the fight against assisted suicide and euthanasia is good care for the sick and dying. The self-respect of sick people cannot be erased by illness and pain. Such.