Index Argumentative Essay Outline on Gun ControlIntroductionGlobal Perspectives on Gun ControlPros and Cons of Gun ControlThe Role of Organizations (NRA)Reasons to Support Gun OwnershipConclusionExample of argumentative essay on gun controlWorks CitedArgumentative Essay Outline on Gun ControlIntroductionDefinition of gun control and its meaningMention of the Second Amendment and the gun ownership debateGlobal perspectives on gun controlComparison of gun control policies in different countries ( Australia, United Kingdom) Discussion of background checks, fees and ratings Pros and cons of gun control Arguments for gun control (reduction of mass shootings, safety) Arguments against gun control (second amendment, self-defense) The role of organizations (NRA) Description of the NRA and its role in supporting gun rights Mention of public perception of these organizations Reasons for supporting gun ownership Self-defense and family protection The belief that current laws do not deter criminals L The idea that gun ownership can deter crime Conclusion The author's personal position on gun control Call for a balanced approach that considers both safety and Second Amendment rights Sample Argumentative Essay on Gun Control Gun Control is the set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification or use of firearms by civilians. Gun ownership is a right enshrined in the U.S. Constitution under the Second Amendment. People who support gun ownership in the United States suggest that guns provide them with safety, while those who support gun control say that gun violence is at an all-time high thanks to legal gun ownership. I will examine the pros and cons of gun control, what reasons people support or oppose the authority, and my opinion on control. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Most countries have a restrictive firearms control policy, and only a few legislations have been classified as permissive. Jurisdictions that regulate access to firearms limit access to only specific categories of weapons and therefore limit the types of persons who will be granted a license to access a firearm. In some countries such as the United States, gun control may be legislated at the local federal or state level. Australia is another country that limits access to guns to its citizens. Australia is strict on gun control because of a mass shooting more than twenty years ago that left thirty-five people dead; The Prime Minister at that time was John Howard. Howard initiated gun reforms that limited gun ownership and reduced mass shootings to zero. Australia has not banned gun ownership but has made it difficult to access and own a gun. Another part of a country that has strict gun ownership is the United Kingdom. UK gun owners undergo a background check, pay certificate fees, renewal fees and are assessed by local police to legally own a gun. Gun owners must safely secure their weapons. I believe that having background checks, paying certificate fees, renewal fees and being evaluated by the local police is good because the government doesn't want peoplecrazy people own guns and know nothing about gun safety and guns in general. If we do this process correctly, we will have fewer mass shootings and lower crime rates. If we put a restriction on an individual weapon or modification of a weapon, people will find a way to get that weapon or change it. People will have to act illegally or legally for a modification or gun. People have the right to bear arms, but why do we need a fully automatic rifle in our homes for self-defense? I wouldn't want to have a fully automatic pistol for self defense. I want something semi-automatic for self defense. Many people who support gun control are afraid of what gun control might limit. After dozens of people died in mass shootings, the public had a generally positive opinion of firearms. For example, Walmart had ammunition available in its stores and rifles for sale in stores until 2015. After the El Paso, Texas, Walmart shooting, Walmart no longer sells ammunition in 2019. Gun control advocates have noted that the companies' action equally significant because similar types of weapons have been used by shooters in recent mass shootings, including the attack on a Colorado movie theater by a gunman that killed twelve people and the elementary school shooting Sandy Hook, where 20 children and six staff members died. I believe if the government put an armed police officer with semi-automatic rifles in schools, movies and special events. The shooter will not have intended to shoot a large group of people because police officers have semi-automatic rifles and are trained to shoot better than the average person who shoots. If we add restrictions on stores, people will find a way to get what they want. Not everyone is in favor of gun control. People believe strongly in the Second Amendment and have continued to support gun rights and oppose stricter gun policy. The most significant supporter of gun rights is the NRA. The NRA stands for National Rifle Association. The politicians of this organization called this group a “terrorist” because they don't know who these people are who support this group. These people are ordinary citizens who protect the Second Amendment. The NRA has fought for years to maintain the rights of American citizens who own guns. The main reason for those in favor of gun control is fear. People want a means to protect themselves from criminals or a suspicious person. People want and feel the need to defend themselves if others attack them. I believe that if someone enters my home with the intent to harm me or my family, I will protect myself with my weapons. I don't want anyone to want me or my family to have problems because I want to make sure everyone is safe and no one is in danger. The second reason is that the laws do not deter criminals and terrorists. People opposed to gun control believe that current gun laws do not reduce criminal activity or terrorist attacks. People think that illegal guns make it easy to commit a crime, regardless of the limit or ban on access to legal firearms. In a 2016 article it is stated that crimes are mostly committed by those who have access to illegal guns and a small portion of these crimes are carried out by legal gun owners "...in about 8 out of 10 cases, the offender was not a lawful gun owner" but rather in illegal possession of a gun that belonged to someone else. (Ingraham). The third reason is that supporters.