Although many children were born with special talents or opportunities that might have allowed them to be creative, innovative, or charming, they grew up to be functional adults who were interested in earning a lot money instead of realizing your dreams. Traditional education helps people become part of society, helps improve people's lives and teaches them values, knowledge and beliefs. However, the traditional education system has caused a lot of controversy since the beginning of formal education because traditional education can harm children's ability to think creatively, innovate and develop fascinating minds. Since the beginning of formal education, traditional education has never deviated from its standard curriculum, the goal of which is student socialization and memorization. The most serious problem is that many countries follow the same educational methods, which kill children's creativity. Furthermore, many countries focus only on consistency, memorization and exam performance. Most schools do not care about the aspirations of their students, even though students may have great talents and creativity because these qualities are not practical for future generations. Traditional education should be changed to cultivate children's creativity, one of the most essential qualities for the future of society and the lives of its citizens. This essay will answer the question "How does school kill creativity?". Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Each country has its own norms, beliefs, and values ​​to create its own culture and future success. Interestingly, however, most countries use the same assessment standards, which do not encourage creativity, but only simplistically evaluate students' basic grades and aptitudes and can kill their fascinating and inquisitive minds and creativity. ability to think creatively. In the article “Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing,” the author states that standardized assessment cannot measure student performance, such as their growth over the course of a year. It also cannot assess students' "soft skills," such as creativity, cooperation and motivation, because the standard assessment only judges specific skills such as reading, math and writing. For example, Sir Ken Robinson presents a good example in a young girl named "Gillian Lynne" in the video "Do Schools Kill Creativity?". Gillian's parents take her to hospital because she has difficulty concentrating on her studies and can't sit still. The doctor attributed her problems to her potential to become a dancer. She has become one of the most famous dancers in the world. As the example shows, traditional education doesn't care about what students want, and imposing the same standard of assessment causes students to miss out on their unique opportunities and abilities. The goal of traditional education is for children to grow up to be functional adults who care for their children. careers so that they can contribute to society. Furthermore, it is useful to learn useful knowledge for the future. However, traditional education has been a controversial topic due to its methods. In the article “How Schools Are Killing Creativity,” Line Dalile states that “Our mission is to ensure that the next generation is full of inventors and mathematicians who, in turn, will take humanity to another level.” According to Dalile, the current education system believes that many scientists are needed to make great contributions tosociety. Traditional education needs students to follow the curriculum to be successful people because it is the best way to get good grades, knowledge and eventually a job; however, these educational methods kill students' creativity and individual talents. Matthew Lynch, states that “The education system does not prepare students for the real world by stifling the imagination. In teaching for tests, learning by memorization and using a standardized curriculum, we have lost imagination and creativity. The students learned to follow by rote and perform. In support of this thesis, it seems that many students are preparing to become robots, following the same curriculum. Using the same educational methods causes all students to share common beliefs and values, discouraging students from thinking creatively because the standard curriculum does not value students' interests, desires, and goals. For example, the American education system forces students to follow narrow paths that leave little room for error and place greater emphasis on meeting set requirements, as cited by Saulat. Standard education focuses only on socializing students. Students' creativity is the most essential part of society. Without creativity, the world would lose its future, opportunities and values. However, many schools still believe that specific traditional areas of emphasis such as reading, writing, and mathematics are more important than creativity. Although traditional education has many benefits, such as good communication between teachers and students, it has numerous negative effects on students. From the moment students begin their education, they lose motivation and interest in what they want. Isabelle Demers says this is because not all schools are created equal, which results in inconsistent academic achievement and motivation. Lack of motivation causes depression, high levels of stress and bad influences on relationships. Furthermore, the lack of motivation causes students to lack career orientation. Having a dream is the most important thing for people's future. However, traditional education does not prepare students for the real world by stifling the imagination, as cited in the article “Does Education Kill the Imagination?”. For example, students cannot learn something meaningful in their lives while following the same standard curriculum. Additionally, Korean students study hard but work for low wages. Many students lose sight of where they want to go and what they want to be, even if they study hard. As mentioned, traditional education harms students' creativity and curiosity. It also has many negative influences on students, such as lack of motivation and lack of career direction. This is why most people think that traditional education should be changed. However, some believe that traditional education should not be changed because it has many advantages. Traditional education can help people gain experience in various technologies, develop good communication skills, broaden knowledge and enlighten discussion. Matthew Lynch points out that traditional education can reveal students' strengths and weaknesses. “It would work well in a group project, where each individual could show both strengths and weaknesses.” Additionally, many students can receive a free education and participate in numerous events that provide valuable experiences. Some people believe that traditional education helps to become functional adults, giving people many experiences and strengthening.