Errors can be present in different ways: verbal, formal and material. Furthermore, it can be positive, negative or emotional. When a contestant uses personal attacks to attack opponents instead of discussing the issues, this counts as an error. If a debtor cannot defend his position with evidence, facts or reasons, he can attack his opponent through straw man, equivocation, circular argument, attribution of question or argumentum ad baculum. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay “The Straw Man” is a verbal slip. One way to increase the strength of the argument is to anticipate possible reflections and then launch a pre-emptive attack. The straw man fallacy consists in first transforming the other person's point of view into an easily overturned version, and then refuting it; however, it is as if a scarecrow was trying to scare a bird. Since the impact is limited; therefore, the impact of defeating an opponent's biased opinion is equally limited. An example would be, according to evolutionary theory, humans evolved from apes. But what the theory of evolution really wants to express is that man and apes have the same ancestor. A circular argument is a verbal error that states a proposition, which must be confirmed. An example would be: God exists because he is recorded in the Bible; the Bible exists because it is inspired by God. The problem with this error is that when one says that the Bible exists because of God, the proposition is unconsciously applied: God exists. Furthermore, if the opponent does not agree with the previous idea, an argument ad baculum may occur. These errors are based on fear or threat. For example, if a person does not believe in God, this person will be burned in hell. Asking the question is another kind of mistake. An example would be: we need to encourage young people to worship God to instill moral behavior. Do religion and worship in God really generate moral behavior? Not necessary. Furthermore, some people claim to know that God exists because the Bible says so, and the Bible does not lie because it was written by God. The reader is asked to directly accept the conclusion without providing any real evidence; the argument either relies on the same argument as the conclusion, or it omits some important assumption on which the argument was based. In the reading “Help Those Who Help, Not Hurt, Themselves,” the author states that homeless people “are content to beg and survive on the generosity of others… squirrels patiently waiting to return to their meal… the best correlation to homelessness I have witnessed is the gray squirrels on Capitol Hill.” Here, the author is basically saying that a homeless person begs and survives on the generosity of others, just like squirrels. So, homeless people are squirrels; which is not true. This is an example of the fallacy of misunderstanding. Where A equals B, B equals C; therefore, A equals C. Keep in mind: this is just an example. Get a custom article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In general, fallacy, as a whole, is a literally illogical and unrealistic way of thinking. It's about questioning logical reasoning. People say this subconsciously all the time because we want others to believe in our perspectives by hook or by crook. Although it is sometimes difficult to immediately identify the different errors; but it is useful to better understand errors by misunderstanding what is often seen in the minds of others. That said, if one doesn't..