Topic > The role of social control for social classes in Britain

Social control refers to the methods used to control the population into behaving in ways that conform to the ideas of those in power in a way that is manageable for those people in power support and control. There are many different agencies responsible for implementing this social control, such as the government and the police. This was especially true in the second half of the 19th century, when urbanization had led most people to move to major cities in search of work in that area's industry. However, while the actions of different state bodies were very important in the daily lives of the public, the state itself, as well as members of the upper class in Britain, were also aware that if the state controlled the public too much the public could become employee and therefore the burden on these agencies would be much greater and they feared that this would lead to a less independent nation. Despite this, in many ways the middle and upper classes were able to use a variety of methods of social control to repress the masses in nineteenth-century England, such as the role of law enforcement or functional segregation. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay First, the use of a significantly expanding legal system has had a great effect on the lives of the working class for several different reasons. The most significant change was the establishment of the first modern police force in 1829 because it meant that in many cases the police were now used to isolate political campaigns and to try to prevent them from spreading or acting to challenge the state instead of the army which had previously served this purpose on some occasions. This was particularly important as there was a growing fear of public disorder in major cities across the UK. There was also a change in how a criminal was sentenced with a greater degree of classification of criminals based on their crimes. This classification also placed more emphasis on the individual committing the crime rather than the crime he or she was committing. There was also the idea of ​​a distinct criminal class made up of repeat offenders who were feared by the upper classes for their public disorder. However, the police presence was questioned in many working-class areas where they felt monitored due to their class and the prejudices associated with it. However, these changes also led to an increase in the number of working-class people reporting crimes as the burden of finding evidence for prosecution was now borne by the police. Overall, while in many ways the legal system has been used to repress the working class, it has also benefited them in other ways. Functional segregation was also used by middle- and upper-class people to repress the masses because it ensured that upper-class housing was never located near a slum. This is because the state did not intervene to provide social housing to slum dwellers as they believed it was a private enterprise. However, this meant that companies run by middle and upper class people were tasked with providing housing for the masses and therefore chose to locate it far from where they lived because it would be considered less desirable. On top of this, the quality of working class housing was also generally quite poor because housing regulations were poorly enforced and only applied to newly built homes..