In July 2018, Ontario's new premier Doug Ford repealed the 2015 sex education curriculum put in place by the previous Liberal Party and introduced the 1998 version as an interim curriculum to which students teachers must comply. Parents of Ontario students appear to still be divided on the issue. The concern about the curriculum is that it introduces controversial topics such as gender fluidity and acceptance of same-sex relationships and families. Most complaints come from parents of religious backgrounds who argue that this violates their right to freedom of religion because many of the topics covered conflict with their beliefs. The concerns of many teachers and students related to the repeal are that the temporary curriculum violates students' rights by lacking inclusiveness. Teachers also expressed anger at a website created where parents can express their concerns with teachers who continue to teach the 2015 curriculum (CBC News, 2018). *Local is global* this effect can be demonstrated as individuals nationally and internationally can see that one of the most progressive nations has repealed curricula that aimed to promote the rights of many individuals, especially LGBT youth. However, the issue has also sparked outrage and movements aimed at recognizing these problems. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The views of teachers and students outraged by the repeal would be in line with much of radical feminist ideals, as in the first chapter it states the The focus of radical feminism is often on issues concerning the body and sexuality . In particular, the issue of sexual consent and seeking personal pleasure would be approved as sexual violence is an important issue supported by radical feminists. However, it also conflicts with the views of some radical feminists who adhere to traditionally binary views of gender identity and expression. Overall, the issue of inclusion in sexuality education programs is a feminist issue as it aims to create equality and address topics that go beyond the majority, or straight and/or cisgender students. In a long article published by the Campaign Life Coalition, one of Canada's largest pro-life lobby groups, they showed immense concern about the curriculum, showing a clear bias against the LGBT population and aiming to discredit those who hold opposing views , claiming that they are a small minority. It is argued that the people who are against repeal and who have spoken out on the issue “do not represent the ordinary voting public at all” and therefore individuals should not allow themselves to be influenced by the “political propaganda campaign of the media” (CLC, n.d. ). The article addressed the issue regarding religion, however it only mentioned that the Catholic school system is unable to teach the curriculum as it goes against their beliefs. * Claims that the curriculum is dangerous for students as it aims to "normalize same-sex 'marriage'," does not accurately represent the risks of contracting sexually transmitted infections through anal intercourse, and that the portrayal of gender as fluid causes gender confusion and could lead to students feeling “'pressured' by the school system to undergo sex reassignment surgery” (CLC, n.d.). Not only are these ideas homophobic and transphobic, but they are taken out of context. In one of the excerpts of the., 2018).