After reading the two articles entitled “Why we don't like women bosses (and why it matters)” (Shiao, 2016) and “Are men better bosses than women? (No, and here's why.)” (Wolfe, 2017), I believe that the latter should be sent to the heads of different departments because it focuses on the capabilities of women in management roles and the examples provided confirm the author's statements very well , which increases the reliability of the article. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The article written by Lahle Wolfe is more convincing as it focuses on the capabilities of women in management roles while the article written by Vivien Shiao focuses on the discrimination against women. Referring to a survey mentioned in the second article conducted by Harvard Business Review, women have surpassed men in leadership skills and skills at all management levels (Wolfe, 2017). This proves that women are better than men in management roles. By demonstrating that women are capable as managers, department heads would be more likely to hire women into senior roles because they are convinced that women managers can deliver better job performance. In contrast, Shiao's article fails to persuade department heads that more women should be hired into management roles because it details the discrimination faced by women and does not provide positive traits of women as managers. For example, the article mentioned that due to insufficient female role models, women in the workforce tend to have less confidence in their abilities (Shiao, 2016, para.14). By demonstrating that women have less confidence in their abilities, the article dissuades department heads from hiring female managers because low confidence is generally seen as an undesirable characteristic in senior roles and can decrease job performance. Thus, Wolfe's article is better than Shiao's article in persuading department heads because it positively portrays women in managerial positions. However, Shiao's article may be more persuasive than Wolfe's article because the focus on discrimination against women may appeal to department heads' rationality that women can be capable when given the chance. According to the article, Shiao states that giving support to women who aspire to and achieve positions of power can help women become more effective leaders and make way for other women ( Shiao, 2016, paragraph 15). This implies that women are unable to showcase their leadership skills due to the lack of support resulting from female prejudice. Therefore, the focus on discrimination in Shiao's article may lead department heads to view women as capable leaders when given the opportunity to do so. As such, they would support the company's efforts to recruit women into senior roles and promote inclusion within the company. Thus, Shiao's article may be more persuasive than Wolfe's because she can garner support for women by appealing to department heads' rationality that women are capable when given the chance. However, Wolfe's article is more reliable and therefore more persuasive than Wolfe's article. Shiao's article because Wolfe supports his claims by corroborating his examples with other sources while Shiao repeatedly used the same example to support his claims. For example, Wolfe included a snippet from a Forbes article to validate his previous survey example.