The benefits of embryonic stem cell research outweigh the moral costs thanks to the countless concrete advantages it can offer the medical community. Stem cell research is an important discussion on which however no agreement has been reached. Is the question that stem cells are looking at a controversial topic or are the companies simply contradicting each other? Stem cell research has become a questionable topic considering three influencing factors: political impact, religion, finally morality and moral beliefs; and when these three components are taken into consideration, the issue of stem portability becomes a controversial topic in America. Undifferentiated cells were first identified in 1978 in human blood, meaning researchers had decided that some cells in the structure could produce platelets. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay When the first versatile in vitro stem cell line was created from mice, it led to the revelation of the first portable embryonic stem cell line from humans. Furthermore, only two or three years a sheep was cloned from undifferentiated organisms. However, just in 2001 the United States established a system for embryonic undifferentiated organisms, but "President George W. Hedge declared an agreement that would allow researchers to use public money to get answers about embryonic undifferentiated organisms." As research funding expanded, progressive and unimaginable measurements were obtained from these exceptional cells. Stem cells are cells that have the ability to develop into many cell types in the body. Stem cells are unique from all other cell types in the body because stem cells are unspecialized cells that have the ability to rapidly self-replicate. Now it does not depend on an individual's age, as the stem cells will still have the ability to adapt to their body. Once a stem cell figures out which section of an organ or tissue it is being injected into, it will immediately adapt to that environment. As quickly as stem cells adapt, they undergo cell division to self-replicate into more than one other healthy cell similar to itself. Ultimately, stem cells have the ability to cure several diseases such as: Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, heart disease, stroke, diabetes, birth defects and spinal cord injuries, and also play an important role in most cancers . With the research carried out so far, there are two types of stem cells that are determined in animals and humans, and they are embryonic and somatic stem cells. Somatic stem cells can be found in the unique organs of adults. Somatic cells are rare cells found in some adult organs. However, these cells have a limited ability to self-replicate and the ability to adapt to different environments in the body. But they could still replicate into new, healthy cells if they were placed in the same part of the body from which they were extracted. The second type of stem cell is called an embryonic stem cell. While somatic stem cells are taken from adults, embryonic stem cells are stem cells received from a historical three to five day old embryo. Embryonic stem cells have the potential to seriously change and replicate into any type of cell or tissue in the body. Unlike somatic cells, embryonic stem cells cannotreplicate only in any cell of the body, but their replication system occurs at a rate three times faster than somatic cells. This ability that embryonic stem cells have is to heal diseases at a much faster rate than somatic cells would ever be able to achieve. Nonetheless, stem cell research would no longer be feasible if it were not for the political influences that assisted and funded this study. Political and governmental are the main reason why stem cell research is considered an essential controversial topic in America. Almost all political figures want to advance their ideas at some point in their mandate. And, to advance their campaigns, politicians manipulate, motivate, and influence the public to bring about the changes they desire in America. Governments around the world have passed regulations to standardize all stem cell research, however, the United States passed laws banning the conception of embryos solely for the cause of stem cell research. Jacqueline Langwith stated in her article, “Introduction to Stem Cells: Opposing Views,” “Some American supporters of embryonic stem cell research found it frustrating that such a large-scale research achievement occurred right behind the United States.” They believed this showed how stem cell research in the United States was lagging behind that in other countries due to government restrictions on federal funding. In 2001, President George W. Bush limited federal funding to research using existing cell strains only.” Scientists could only use embryos that were no longer wanted through fertility clinics. However, disagreements arose when political events debated the funding approach for stem cell research. In another academic article “The Public, Political Parties, and Stem Cell Research,” Blendon states: “Republicans are much less supportive than Democrats. About half of Republicans want medical research involving embryonic stem cells, while the rest believe such research should not be banned. Blendon also explains that each celebration had opposing views regarding funding for stem cell research and whether it should continue to be America's top priority. Furthermore, in the book The Stem Cell Dilemma, Furcht and Hoffman similarly explain how unique political figures had a special position on this issue. First of all, George W. Bush did not take for granted that stem cell research was the most important issue facing America. When Obama was chosen for president, he reversed Bush's stem cell policy and expanded the broad range of stem cell lines that were useful for stem cell research. The government gives out billions of dollars to biomedical research every year, however, once the money was divided for each biomedical research, there wasn't enough to fund for stem cell research. This has also led political parties to debate whether or not they need to receive more tax funding or whether the available funding should be sufficient. The more stem cell research is delayed, the more time, money and new papers are wasted. Political events and government figures are debating this time-dependent issue, proving that stem cell research is an essential debate for America. In addition to political influences, religion also drives cell researchstem cell an essential and controversial issue, since for the first time in history it has created a barrier between science and research on embryonic stem cells and others believe that such research should not be banned, in contrast to two-thirds of Democrats. Blendon also explains that each celebration had opposing views regarding funding for stem cell research and whether it should continue to be America's top priority. Furthermore, in the book The Stem Cell Dilemma, Furcht and Hoffman similarly explain how unique political figures have had a special position on this issue. True to his words, Bush reduces federal funding for cell lines. , which over time destroyed many embryos and slowed the pace of research. Bush's choice triggered more than one heated discussion with other politicians during his tenure who needed the research. Then, when Obama was chosen for president, he reversed himself. Bush expanded his coverage to stem cells and expanded the wide variety of stem cell lines that had been useful for stem cell research. The federal government distributes billions of dollars to biomedical research each year, however, once the money was divided for each biomedical research, there was not enough funding for stem cell research. This has also led political parties to discuss whether it is either no longer necessary to receive more cash funding from taxes or the achievable funding must be sufficient. The money came from taxpayers, then taxpayers against the research fought over where their money went. The longer stem cell research is delayed, the more time, money and new data is wasted. Furthermore, the fact that political events and government figures are debating this time-dependent issue demonstrates that stem cell research is an essential debate for America. In addition to political influences, religion also makes stem cell research an essential and controversial issue, as for the first time in history it has created a barrier between science and equality as human beings and the need to grant them ethical rights. Another moral situation available to society is human reproductive cloning, which can take place starting from embryonic stem cells. Through embryonic stem cells, scientists are able to clone reproductive human embryos that, in the correct environments, are able to continue to exist and grow as ordinary humans. This presupposed that scientists, by hook or by crook, had figured out how to clone babies, but there were some scientific uncertainties. This was another major ethical concern for society and individuals, in fact, human cloning had pushed aside the previous issue of killing embryos and was now the primary concern. However, there were still multiple scientific uncertainties that were not resolved and which may have posed problems for the clones in the future. The morality of human reproductive cloning has been questioned with the help of multiple people. However, the ethical questions about human reproductive cloning were that it was not safe, it was no longer imperative for medical use, and there is no right for adolescents to exist unless they have genetically related relatives. Being able to choose the sex and the genes to activate in a human being is unethical because the right to the fetus is taken away. That vital child is not given the right to be who he is, to specify himself and to be more extraordinary than others. Cloning means that there will be a human being who will look like223702/