The way Sapiens started was amazing. I believe this is a must-read book of all time: a brilliantly written collection of thoughts from a curious person who has dedicated his life to science but doesn't want to bore you with his thesis. I liked how the author's voice and information about the ancient times of humanity were fascinating. I don't have adequate knowledge of any non-fiction and the origin of humans, so I was excited to learn more about our origins. However, I soon tired of the author's ironic and condescending humor. His confidence shone through in all his words and personal opinions, and the way he tried to enforce them bothered me a little. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Here are some of the points I disagree with. On page 152 paragraph 10 chapter "There is no justice in history" on the hierarchy of rich and poor, Harari states that, apart from the fact that poverty is a natural state of mankind, insight and collaboration are needed to get out of that type of condition. Harari asks why do we have poverty? This is why he writes that most people born into poor families tend to be poor throughout their lives. It could be the truth. But the real question here should have been: why does prosperity exist? Harari seems unprepared to vouch for the reason for the existence of that kind of culture and completely avoids the concept of the documented economic mobility of many Americans. In chapter 6, Harari's "rewriting" of the Declaration of Independence is pure sophistry. obvious truths, that all men have evolved differently, that they are born with certain changing characteristics and that among these are life and the search for pleasure. "When analyzing the difference between the biological fact and the actual words of the Declaration it was seen that Haari thinks that people do not believe in human equality because it is an objective truth and, because it is not, they believe in it so that society can function in an organized way. Transcribing a statement of ideas in biological terms is a mistake. We know that it is inappropriate to measure happiness; Harari simply replaced/alternated it with 'pleasure' as if it were somehow more precise for increasing the level of endorphins. Harari mainly uses immature alternations and clichés to deny the actuality of the human soul and the presence of God. According to him, these abstruse and immaterial theories do not exist only because scientists have not found them in a concrete and material world. Paradoxically it states that scientists do not know where the human mind resides, yet there is clear scientific evidence that it does. Harari fabulously claims that the Catholic church's statement "human life begins at conception" is unscientific. statement but preordained doctrine in what the adamant Catholic believes. If this is the case, and there is nothing radically distinctive about the human being compared to the rest of beings, then why is the suffering of domestic animals not taken into account, but not that of human embryos or fetus in case of abortion . Please note: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay For Harari, the only human quality responsible for human supremacy in nature is the capacity for flexible cooperation in contrast to the rigid cooperation of the rest of the animals. No analysis to examine the profound reasons for this strange quality that allows us to overcome instincts and cruel law.