Topic > "Method" [in] Michel Foucault's history of sexuality: critical analysis

The "Method" chapter of Foucault's history of sexuality characterizes his vision of power. Foucault rebukes the constraints of the "juridical-discursive" origin of power, which considers power as something that is finally exercised to command, subjugate or subjugate a subject: power is all-encompassing: everything and everyone is the foundation of Power, and in every connection there is domination, immobility. or submission does not mean an absence of power to the same extent that Foucault advances five suggestions with respect to power. Say no to plagiarism. Get a original essay To begin with, power is not something you can or cannot have, rather it is continually practiced from all points of view in any connection. Secondly, power is not only remotely connected to sex, economics and knowledge . Or perhaps it is inside these connections and decides their internal structure. Third, power does not simply descend from above, and not all power connections are shaped according to a ruler/ruled model. Relatively, power connections develop at all levels of society regardless of decision-making powers. Fourthly, although it is possible to recognize contours and systems in power relations, there are no individual subjects who exercise this power. There is a sanity and logic behind the bonds of power, but there are no mysterious plans or driving forces coordinating these powers. Finally, obstruction is part of a power relationship and is not external to it. Furthermore, opposition does not typically manifest itself in a strong and implacable framework. Or perhaps, pockets of obstruction form in better places and move as the flow of power changes. Foucault's investigation of power demonstrates that we cannot talk about sexuality in terms of an independent power connection. Or perhaps we need to take a closer look at all the various power relations surrounding our discussions about sex leading to one showing up the way it does. Foucault established four rules to follow that serve as guidelines in his examination: Keep in mind: this is just one example. Get a custom article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Rule of Immanence: We should see power and knowledge as constantly associated. There is no such thing as impartial information. We should know that what we think about sex and how we come to discover it are both dictated by the power relations that inspire our willingness to think about sex. Rules of continuous variation: power does not manifest itself in static relationships. instead, Foucault recognizes structures of change. Where the idea of ​​a power relationship can change over time. Rule of double conditioning: each individual nearby power center is part of larger techniques, and each larger methodology depends on nearby power centers, but one does not imitate the other. Rule for the tactical polyvalence of discourse: Discourse is what unites information with power, and like power itself, discourse works in a wide range of different ways. There is far from a simple predominant/commanded connection in the discourse, and stillness generally does not imply moderation. Foucault concludes by saying that power does not appear as law. But instead it works on numerous levels and in different ways.