Liberalism was a system used to protect the rights to life, property, and liberty, in which society governed itself as a group not controlled by a particular party. Cause of the Great Trek which aimed at liberalism and aimed at pursuing its own republic. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The Dutch-speaking colonial movements known as "The Great Trek" were the migration of Boers who traveled through the interior of southern Africa in search of land where they could establish their permanent homeland to live beyond the independence of British colonial rule. This movement was carried out by approximately 1200-1400 Boers between 1835 and 1840. The Boers were against the policies of the British government because they lived differently from the English and wanted to impose their rules and regulations on the Boers. It was a fairly orderly mass rebellion against a security breakdown that participants considered intolerable. The causes of the Great Trek were complex, many moved because they had been stripped of all their land in the border districts, their jobs and their security, things they felt unable to deal with due to lack of representation, giving rise to a deep sense of marginalization Due to the scarcity of land on the frontier the situation did not seem to decrease but worsened between 1812 and the mid-1830s. During this time Dutch families had to move to a new farm after the pastures had been exhausted, but this was determined if there was free land, land that could be taken without paying money and that would be converted into a borrowed farm . In 1813 the English abolished the familiar agricultural loan system and implemented a quitrent property system. This tenure system pushed the Boers to move north, the market price of established farms rose, and people left the colony with the aim of being able to obtain land. Many traveling Boers sold their farms and moved across the border. In 1828, after the British announced the ordinance, the lack of labor increased, the ordinance was in favor of the natives, it freed them from their owners and made them choose who they wanted to work for, this caused the dissatisfaction of the Boers. The situation worsened when the owners lost the controlling authority over the slaves or servants, this happened on December 1, 1834 when the right to punish slaves, the slave trade and slavery were banned, slaves were allowed to carry their masters in court, this caused the slaves to become slaves. do what they want because they were getting freedom from their masters. For this reason, many Voortrekker leaders were penalized by law for punishing their minions. Severe border insecurity occurred when farmers' livestock were stolen by Bushmen. The government was unable to control the influx, many border dwellers did not know how to cope with these flows and many were suffering heavy losses of flocks and herds and some were in fear for their lives. After 1825, complaints against the masters increased as the administrative problem became important. There were no rights for citizens, only blacks had one. The protection of the law was known as Governor D'Urban. Political marginalization: The landless left the colony but wealthy farmers also sold their farms cheaply due to lack of representation. There was no developed theory of racism among the farmers ofborder. The lack of representative bodies would be used to represent the claims of the bourgeois, the abolition of the landdrost constituencies in 1828 was part of a progressive revision of the administrative system and removed all the institutions that the border citizens trusted when they had important political and social powers. transformation, citizens left the colony because the English did not protect their needs and they had no representative, instead the government favored blacks over them. The first Voortrekker governments (the decentralized government and administrative system during the Great Trek). As the Voortrekkers were looking for a permanent place to settle their independent republic. Great Trek leaders Louis Trichardt and Hans Van Rensburg opened the way for the Dutch to the Transvaal, while Andries Potgieter, Maritz and Piet Retief found a settlement in the north. These leaders created a solution to the problem they were facing by encouraging the Boers to leave the Cape frontier so they could be free from British control and be able to choose their own cultural values ​​in their own political system. The Voortrekkers wanted to be autonomous and have their own personal freedom. The philosophy of the Afrikaners expressed its call for action to the frontiersman and awakened the form of the idealist and transformed the journey from a reckless rebellion into a divinely inspired mission in Africa. On February 2, 1837, Piet Retief published his manifesto in the “Grahamstown Journal”. His manifesto was considered the voice of the Great Trek, it emphasized the idea that the autonomies wanted to free themselves from the British and rise up against government rule. to be equal with the serfs, pervaded by the lack of security they wanted protection from the British government due to the losses suffered in the frontier wars. The influence of the Difaqane/Mfecane on the republican ideal. From the 1780s in the territory from Delagoa Bay to the Tugela River a number of African chiefs were involved in conflict forming power blocs. These wars were happening to these chiefdoms/kingdoms, the Zulus, Ndebele, Tswana, Pedi and so on. Mfecane (crush, dispersal, forced dispersal, forced migration), this was a time of widespread warfare and chaos among African kingdoms and chiefdoms. Mfecane was portrayed in a positive light as ushering in a period of state-building of innovative rules in South Africa and a state strong enough to challenge expansion at home. Mfecane occurred due to overpopulation due to the availability of food resources and the effect of climate change which caused drought and long-term environmental degradation which led to competition for land classification, the need to exercise sufficient power to control access to trade with European countries, as ivory became an increasingly desired item. All this led to what is called “Shaka's War”, because the whole African kingdom became stronger and wanted to have more power and be rich. The Difaqane (crush, dispersal, forced dispersal, forced migration), in 1750, internecine and civil wars affected the Hurutshe, Kwena, Rolong, and so on, in the former Western Transvaal. This created an ongoing process whereby chiefdoms separated and allied themselves with other powerful groups leading to fragmentation between groups, which intensified in the late 18th century. The Sotho-Tswana speaking chiefdoms were perhaps not based on the same kind of militarism and especially autocracy as many Nguni, and were unable to resist the scale and intensity of the raiders who entered their territories from 1822. Governments Voortrekker on the Highveld. In the 1830s?