Throughout chapter 1, Tacitus combines a number of literary techniques with a variety of contextual factors (such as the death of Germanicus and some rumors surrounding the devious methods by which Sejanus came to power) to characterize both men highly negatively, reflecting the general subordination of integrity and moral fiber to the acquisition of power. Indeed, the connotations of wealth and prosperity in the words 'compositae' (well-ordered) and 'florentis' (flourishing) contrast strongly with the subsequently mentioned death of Germanicus, highlighting the fact that Tiberius directly benefited from the suffering of others and, for extension, characterizing him as a cold, almost heartless figure. The direct juxtaposition of the phrases "Germanici mortim" (the death of Germanicus) and "inter prosper" (among his blessings) serves to further emphasize his acceptance of death and suffering as a tool for the further attainment of power, underscoring the lack of compassion in both his character and his empire. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay This lack of human empathy is especially troubling considering Tiberius' very high level of influence, characterizing him as a dangerous emperor who, as long as it benefits him, will not allow kindness of heart to thwart his goals. The fact that Germanicus was such a popular figure still has implications for Tiberius' character, portraying him as an outsider whose interests are separate from those of his subjects. The use of the present participle 'florentis' (flourishing) highlights the continued progress made under his rule, as well as, more subtly, the constant application of his quite immoral values, which characterize him as relentlessly selfish and indifferent to human suffering. Indeed, Tattitus's use of polyptoton in 'saevire' and 'saevientibus' (cruel) highlights the abundance of malice throughout his inner circle, demonstrating the fact that the immorality that characterizes his own rule is it is widespread beyond his own personality. This once again paints him as an irresponsible ruler, bordering on tyrannical. Furthermore, the high level of clarity in the phrase "initium et causa" (beginning and cause) lends a strong sense of certainty and conviction to his subsequent attack on Sejanus' character, as well as highlighting Sejanus's direct and manipulative role in the events. This effect is reinforced by Tacitius' use of the tricolon in "originem, mores, et quo facinore" (his beginnings, his character and from what crime), constructing, in direct contrast to Sejanus's devious manipulations, a clear and direct argument, once again adding a highly persuasive tone of conviction and certainty. This adds a greater level of credibility to his forthcoming characterization of Sejanus as a highly devious and manipulative figure, while the fact that the connotations of corruption in "fixer" (crime) are placed in such close proximity to basic and rudimentary elements of his personality as his 'originem' (beginning) and 'mores' (character) imply that crime is a fundamental element of his character. Furthermore, the use of praeteritio in 'non sine noise' (not without voices) subtly plays on the rumors that Sejanus sexually prostituted himself to gain power. The subtlety of the phrase reflects the scandalous nature of the accusations, further adding to the characterization of Sejanus as devious and deceitful. This combines with the connotations of cunning and manipulation in 'devinxit' (to bind) to once again characterize Sejanus as an exploiter.