Topic > Kant vs. Mill on the issue of lying - 1763

Firstly, looking at the first patient, whether she receives a kidney from her father or a "cadaver kidney", there will be no difference because she still needs a kidney . The second patient, however, cannot accept to donate his kidney because one of the main reasons is that he is afraid and lacks "the courage to make this donation"9. So precisely at this point we see that it would be better if the father did not give away his kidney because it would not give him any happiness, while the daughter has two possibilities to dedicate herself to everyday life, either on a basic personal level or on a professional basis, there are difficult scenarios, also called moral dilemmas. Depending on who the person is or what their beliefs and value systems are, the problem can be “solved”. In this particular case, doubts arise as to whether it is morally right to lie to family members when something can be done, ignoring the fact of its consequences. The case will be explained in detail later including the patient's status, but to answer this ethical question two theorists will be presented for and against. On the one hand, the deontologist Immanuel Kant will be presented with his theory that lying is prohibited under all circumstances, on the other, on the pro side, John Stuart Mill will be presented with the utilitarian theory that whatever decision brings the most happiness is the best . right decision. After discussing the case, my personal view on what is right will be stated with my reasons, which is that lying is the right decision to make. This case study, taken from the book Medical Ethics by Robert M. Veatch, concerns 5 a one-year-old girl, who for the last 3 years has suffered from "progressive renal failure" which...... middle of paper.. .... for no one would tell the truth. and a donor kidney .Books:Hill, Thomas E., “Categorical and Hypothetical Imperatives.” In The Blackwell Guide to Kant's Ethics. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 5-9.Rachels, James and Stuart Rachels. "7,8,9,10." In The Elements of Moral Philosophy. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2010. 97-145.Veatch, Robert M., “The Normative Principles of Medical Ethics.” In Medical Ethics. 1997. Reprint, Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 1989 29-56. Websites: consequentialist. Dictionary.com. Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House, Inc. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/consequentialist (accessed December 5, 2011).Mill, John Stuart. "John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism." Utilitarianism: past, present and future. http://www.utilitarism.com/mill2.htm (accessed December 05, 2011).