First Meditation - What can be questionedSay no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Presents his task of building another logical and philosophical learning framework using his technique for uncertainty. As indicated by Descartes, neither faculties nor reason can be trusted, as it is conceivable that we are confused regarding their redemption. We know of frequent errors of recognition and this should recommend, in this outrageous philosophical enterprise, to reject the evidence of the faculties altogether, since they are not reliable. But there is a clear distinction between a near misstep, for example, seeing a square top as round over there, and a global error, which would occur while everything we experience is fuzzy. However, since any authentic tactile experience can be duplicated as fantasy, if there are no methods to distinguish imagination from attention, we cannot guarantee whether the experience consistently reflects a world beyond the brain or not. The imagination theory would leave aside information about things like scientific facts, since they are no less valid in dreams. However, Descartes argues, if there were an evil devil with full authority over my brain, at that point he could always deceive me, for the certainty that normally comes to even the simplest of contemplations, for example, that 2 + 2 = 4, could be really his creation, of which I am certain. Second Meditation - The nature of the human mind and how it is better known than the body Constructs its Archimedean purpose of security, the Cogito and demonstrates that, in opposition to basic belief, we realize that the mind is superior to all we know of the our general environment (assuming there is one, questions still remain about Descartes' thesis today). In Meditation 1 Descartes offered the "devil's contention" that we can never know whether a malevolent evil spirit is deceiving us into accepting what we believe to be valid. Currently, in Contemplation 2, Descartes argues that no matter how subtle the evil presence is, it cannot make me believe that I do not exist, since doubt about that idea will make one aware that it is being assumed. The uniqueness of the psyche and the body is discovered, just as the brain is not expanded and the body is; However, Descartes admits that he cannot yet say whether this is a genuine or simply calculated refinement. By holding a piece of wax close to the flame, Descartes argues that bodies are not seen by faculties but rather by acuity. If it were simply the set of these properties, we would have to assume that one object was destroyed and another created. Acumen understands that the quintessence of the body is spatial increase, which is safeguarded (when modified) with respect to the difference in reasonable properties. Reflection on the Beginning Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Customize essayHowever I must here think that I am human, and consequently I will not stop to speak to myself and my fantasies things similar, or sometimes more uncertain than these fools when they are alert. Suppose then that we are sleeping and that each of these points of interest, in particular the fact that we open our eyes, shake our head, that we spread our hand, etc., are nevertheless false deceptions and we trust that perhaps our hands, nor our whole body, not as we see them. In any case, it should in any case admit that the things spoken of in repose resemble works of art and compositions, which can be configured as a resemblance of something genuine and genuine, and therefore, at least for these.