IndexBureaucracy as a Possible Approach to ManagementMain Points, Pros and Cons of Scientific Management TheoryConclusionReferencesThis analysis report will cover the following on what exactly bureaucratic and administrative management means and the specific management scientific management style. We will begin this essay with definitions of the main terms and its objectives below. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Bureaucracy as a possible approach to management Bureaucracy is a legal approach to management in which the rules established within a company are simpler and devoid of emotions/feelings. Organization and structure are the two main elements that create a hierarchy that clearly defines these rules. This ensures management achieves organizational goals to create the “ideal” organization/company. The purpose of bureaucratic management is to achieve qualification-based hiring, merit-based promotion, chain of command, division of labor, impartial application of rules and procedures, recorded in writing, and ultimately the separation of managers from owners. Max Weber is the man of Bureaucracy was a German political economist and sociologist, who is a modern example of organizational theory. Rational legal decision rules and organizational hierarchy have shaped both the public and private sectors and how they view the term bureaucratic management. A public sector example would be “Environmental Protection Agency” and a private sector example would be “IBM”. The second term of this analysis question is administrative management. This management style focuses on the principles of management: planning, organizing, coordinating, command and control. Overall there are 14 management principles. The five indicated above are the most important with regards to administrative management. It helps manage information through people. This is a more formalized approach to management that involves a clear division of labor among employees, delegation of authority and power to those higher up in the hierarchy of areas of responsibility. In this analysis I will examine the scientific management formed by Frederick W. Taylor, Lillion and Frank Gilbreth, and Henry Gantt. The main ideas of this theory are to identify the best and most efficient way to complete a job/task by studying and testing different working methods. Improve economic efficiency and in particular labor productivity. Main points, pros and cons of scientific management theory Briefly explaining the main ideas of scientific management goes step by step. The first is to find the best way to complete each element of the job by studying it and finding a solution. The second is to scientifically select, train and develop employees to help them reach their full potential in their assigned task. The third is to work with employees to ensure they follow mutually agreed-upon guidelines. The fourth is to ensure equality among employees and ensure that there is a fair division of labor between managers and employees within the company. Finally, it is to compensate the salary with a fair analysis of the employees' working day. These steps help shape the management style of scientific management. There are many advantages and disadvantages of scientific management. The main point of the theory that I admire is how it can train employees' minds to achieve higher results in work production. This happens through thespecialization of the division of labor so that employees are placed in work areas of which they already have good knowledge and in which they are specialized. It can improve the connection between employees and managers and revolutionize the mindset of both internal stakeholders. Reducing production costs could be an advantage IF employees can adapt well to changes and perform well in their positions. Two things that I suspect could go wrong with scientific management is that for small businesses this is very unsuitable as it would be too expensive for the company to implement these rules and regulations. Another disadvantage would be if employees were unable to adapt to the new rules. If so, this creates a poor response from workers. “The McDonaldization of society” written by George Ritzer in 2000. It clearly specifies how scientific management is used in the contemporary world. For example, "McDonald's" is a huge franchise company that has thousands of stores around the world. Some management techniques noted in the book included McDonald's ensuring there are "accurate cooking times for all products" and "temperature settings for all equipment." This was achieved through the division of labor; McDonald's divided employees into smaller groups so they would only focus on their part of the job. For example, the cooks had to grill the meat moving from left to right, with six rows of meatballs and six meatballs each. (Ritzer (2000) page 38). McDonald's is a perfect example of a successful company that has brought benefits to scientific management. Every McDonald's uses the same techniques and rules, making it the largest restaurant chain in the world. McDonald's has changed the world of "fast food" and has guaranteed consumers that they will receive their order in a very short time frame and continually manages to achieve this with highly trained staff. Frederick W. Taylor, Frank Gilbreth, and Lillian have all successfully changed the way businesses operate and work with managers and employees. Setting tasks and objectives to be achieved to ensure the highest quality of production. Frederick W. Taylor succeeded in developing scientific methods for getting work done, providing rewards for achieving goals, setting productivity goals, and training employees on how to use the methods to achieve productivity and overall goals. The only factor that would prevent Frederick W. Taylor from fully realizing his theory of scientific management would be that establishing an exact time, place, and structure would not leave the employee the ability to think clearly about what he is assigned. In other words, the employee may feel overwhelmed or pressured to achieve the goals/tasks set by managers. Scientific management has benefited many aspects of a company. Scientific management can improve workplace cost reduction, better product quality, division of labor, better working conditions and resource utilization. It will also benefit internal stakeholders such as owners and shareholders as increased production and productivity will lead to more turnovers which will translate into higher profits for investors. For employees, their work can become easier as tasks are defined for the people best suited to the role of the position with the help of professional training, they can feel more comfortable at work due to the fact that they are succeeding in their job position. Consumers can also benefit from scientific management as they can achieve a higher standard of living since.