Being able to vote before the age of 18 in primary elections would be a good idea. Nearly half a million or more Texas citizens turn 18 each year. Having their vote can make a big difference, plus having the right to vote in the general election (November) and not being able to do so in the primary (March) is unfair because they would have no say in determining who will be in office. that general election vote. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay Being a Texas legislator, voting would be in favor of allowing the young/future generation to decide who they would like to vote for in the general election. This would in no way offend the amendment of the United States Constitution, we would simply allow able citizens to vote in the presidential election held in November, but not in the primary election held in March. Studies show that young people will vote whenever asked to do so: this disposition expands young people's engagement in the political process by modeling a supportive character from an earlier age. Research has shown that the best indicator of whether someone will vote in elections is whether they voted in the last ones. The reason for this would be that if, once a person votes, that individual is likely to vote again in the future, doing so would initiate the propensity to vote at a more stable time in a young person's life and drive a significantly more voter high. Voter turnout, which is much needed as Texas each year for a seemingly endless period of time, holds near-base positions in providing valuable input during elections, with voter turnout plummeting even lower during non-presidential elections. There seems to be no reason why a person who can vote in November (general election), cannot vote to decide who should be the candidate party. Seeing a 16 year old in Texas can get married (with parental consent), drive, work, pay taxes and be sentenced to an adult sentence in a courtroom. However, they are not ready to have a say in our appointment framework. It might seem like a small move, but it would be vital for young people's turnout. Furthermore, it would increase and increase voter turnout in the long run as these absorbed young people would continue to vote in every single subsequent election. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get Custom EssayWhen young people are still in school, they would probably attract different opinions on political issues from their peers. Because they would have the ability to vote, these students would have an even greater stake in the outcomes of this election and would be more engaged. Levine, associate dean for research at Tufts University, says, "Most of us won't vote unless we see people around us voting; that's where we get the idea that it's a civic responsibility To get into the voting booth, we also need to hear arguments, debates, and emotional appeals about the importance of current issues".