Over time, the use of the English language as a form of expression has evolved, although not in the right direction. As a result, it has altered the way audiences interpret texts, which forces us to recognize George Orwell's concerns regarding the current state of the English language. Currently, it is not only bland but also thought-provoking and lacking in vividness, which has culminated in the poor writing we produce. The current state of the English language and many of its nuances are associated with the degradation of the English language, seen by some as the product of economic and political writings. However, unfortunately we believe that nothing can be done to stop this routine that we have created. George Orwell's article "Politics and the English Language" tries to restore the correct use of the English language through his discourse on the state of the English language and the misapplication of figurative language, which has lost its correct meaning in over the years. By establishing a connection between language use and writing style, this essay clarifies the ability to think clearly and write honestly, which reflects how they see and represent the world in writing. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The state of the English language can be considered alarming and pushes us to reflect on what triggered this puzzling situation. Aided by his deftly persuasive style, Orwell criticizes five examples of "poor writing", outlining their common defects, such as the "staleness of the images" and the "lack of precision". This not only makes it difficult for the reader to understand the message but also lose interest in reading. George Orwell's essay was greatly influenced by its context, when people began to witness the political debasement of the German language under the Nazis and the Russian language under Stalin during their respective wars. Being particularly sensitive to political manipulation, Orwell was forced to reflect on how the English language had changed during these war years. Orwell then criticizes the modern style of writing in his essay, stating that one's position on a political issue will determine how one will write or speak about it. He points out that all writing is fundamentally political and that bad writing styles produce oppressive political mindsets. His claim that “the current political chaos is linked to the decay of the language” is supported by his lack of meaning. His concern about this is reflected in his assertion that the use of verbiage and jargon as a means of conveying political thought actually lacks substance. Overload of meaningless jargon, pretentious phrases and words that have taken their place in the everyday language used by cross sections of the community. Exposing how contemporary political language uses stock phrases, "euphemisms, questions and sheer cloudy vagueness", he posits that the metaphorical use of 'cloudy' indicates a lack of clarity and conciseness. His claims about the concealment of truth in political writings are further supported in “A mass of Latin words falls on the facts like soft snow.” The simile of "like soft snow" indicates the pretentious use of Latin phrases, which instead of disclosing the facts clearly distorted them. Thus, Orwell's speech on the state of the English language not only forced us to reflect on his concerns but also paved the way for its proper use. Orwell highlights how the lack of concise language results in “scams and perversions” in the.