IndexHistory and Prominent Figures in Solution-Focused TherapyDevelopment Process of Solution-Focused Therapy (SFT)Basic Assumptions, Structures, Techniques, and Efficiencies of SFTSimilarities VS Dissimilarities in SFT and other theoriesPersonal reflections and views on SFTIntegration of SFT principles and techniques into practiceConclusion and final reflectionsReferencesSolution focused therapy (SFT) is one of the four social construction models, directing clients to seek a solution rather than seeking an explanation of their problems. Solution-focused therapy, as stated in the essay, focuses on the future with minimal discussion of clients' past or present problems and interventions that target the solution. In solution-focused therapy, clients use language to focus on reality by creating solutions to their problems and evoking cognitive change. It is psychotherapeutic, emphasizes clients' words, respects their opinions and does not exert any pressure for change. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayHistory and Prominent Figures in Solution-Focused TherapySteve de Shazer, Insoo Kim Berg, Yvonne Dolan, and Eve Lipchik are some of the leading figures in Solution-Focused Theory. SFT was first developed in the late 1970s and early 1980s by social worker Steve de Shazer, his Korean wife Insoo Kim Berg, and associates who eventually joined. Michele Weiner-Davis joined the team in 1993 during brief family therapy in Milwaukee, Scott Miller in 1994 and Eve Lipchik joined in 2002. Steve de Shazer while at the Mental Research Institute (MRI) in Palo Alto, California , worked with John Weakland, who was one of the founders of brief strategic family therapy. John Weakland based this brief strategic family therapy on the “interactional view” in which clients' problems were seen as occurring between people rather than within. Thus, early solution-focused theory was closely identified with the strategic approach to family therapy and incorporated some of Milton Erikson's indirect therapeutic techniques. Milton Erickson's therapeutic techniques and the MRI model of brief therapy influenced the development of SFT. Furthermore, the concept of a language game developed by the linguistic philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein was incorporated into the SFT. A language game means that the conversation individuals engage in can be used to determine their reality. De Shazer and members of his team see MRI's problem-focused philosophy as limitations. In MRI therapy clients are directed to change behavior that has not worked for them. While in solution-focused therapy known as the Milwaukee model, clients are directed to change their cognition as new ways to deal with the problem. Then, the modification of the MRI Problem-Focused Brief Therapy gave birth to the Milwaukee Solution-Focused Brief Therapy. Solution Focused Therapy (SFT) Development Process There have been ongoing developments since the inception of solution focused brief therapy in the 1980s, which is significant in the UK context. Steve de Shazer became the main representative of the SFT because he wrote more articles than his colleagues. de Shazer has explored and collaborated with other researchers to modify some existing theories. The transition from problem-focused to solution-focused therapy wasgradual and lasted for many years. Along the way, many short models have been developed from solution-focused theory. Short Solution Ritual Therapy was developed to accommodate the spiritual and emotional parts of clients. Additionally, Steve de Shazer and his colleagues have given numerous conference presentations, reviewed submitted articles, and trained therapists to disseminate, articulate, and modify existing theories. In the late 1980s, a team of London-based family therapists read some of the articles written by Steve de Shazer and adopted the SFT model into their practice. Additionally, Chris Iveson, Evan George, and Harvey Ratner have become aware of the potential and values of solution-focused therapy. Based on this awareness, the practice of brief therapy known as BRIEF was developed. Studies show that solution-focused therapy is internationally recognized and believed to be one of the fastest growing therapies in family therapy school. Furthermore, qualitative interviews with some of the founders of solution-focused therapy show that interpersonal, intrapersonal, and climatic conditions and dynamics were important for the development of solution-focused theory to take place. It was observed that the founders' relationship with their surroundings and group activities encouraged the solution-focused therapeutic development process. After the deaths of Steve de Shazer in 2005 and his wife in 2007, Lipchik and Weiner-Davis continued the practice of solution-focused therapy in Milwaukee while Miller practiced in Chicago. Basic Assumptions, Structures, Techniques and Efficiency by SFTSteve de Shazer and his The team had some assumptions that provided the framework for solution-focused therapy. They assumed that clients wanted to change, were ready to focus on the present and future, and believed that therapeutic dialogue would move from “problem talk” to “solution talk.” The SFT therapist-client relationship is critical where clients have a sense of hope. They believed that clients had strengths that could help them turn small changes into larger ones. Finally, solutions are assumed that are not necessarily linked to the problems. Considering these assumptions, the founders of solution-focused theory believed that each and every solution was unique. Based on these assumptions, a common approach used in solution-focused therapy is goal-setting language to help clients focus on solution talk. In most cases the client's response to goal setting questions such as "What is your goal in coming for counseling?" It depends on their mindset regarding the negative or positive goal. There are three basic types of therapeutic questions that are often used during the initial session of the solution-focused approach. These questions are miracle questions, exceptions and scalable. The first is the miracle question, solution focused therapists use this question to help clients "think outside the box" and redirect their minds towards a brighter future regardless of the path they choose. Miracle questions focus on how customers imagine problem solving can make a difference and act as solution amplification. A miracle question can go like this; What if a miracle happened tonight and you woke up tomorrow to find that the problem that brought you to therapy has been solved. What would be the first thing you do? Who will you notify first? What would their reaction be? What are the main things thatwill they notice? What would their reaction be? And how would you react in return?'. Customers' responses can engage their minds with positive thoughts about a better future. The second is the exceptional questions that emerge after the series of miraculous questions has been thoroughly addressed. These questions concern the client's social life, help clients think about the good times spent with their family members. Clients' responses let them know that life is not all about problems, so they must find a way to solve their current problems. The last ones are the scaling questions, once the exception questions have been successfully extracted during the session. Clients are asked to scale their problems on a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 is the current level and 0 is when things were at their worst. Clients' responses help counselors know the level of their problem for integrating an appropriate intervention. Additionally, scaling questions allow therapists to monitor clients' progress during the counseling session and the effectiveness of the intervention used. The application of the intervention is next in the structure of the application.solution focused therapy (SFT) model. The therapist begins the intervention by asking clients if they agree with the feedback. Feedback reflects the session, evaluates where appropriate and includes the way forward. After feedback, the therapist will assign clients achievable, realistic, and measurable tasks related to their therapeutic input. The therapist will complement clients as a way to encourage them to achieve their goals. The purpose of the compliment is to remind clients that they are appropriately showing resilience in the face of their problem. Scaling questions can be applied after the intervention to monitor its effectiveness. Many researchers are interested in studying the effectiveness of SFT at various levels. For example, research provides support for the use of SFBT regarding internalizing and externalizing child behavior problems. They found that SFBT is effective as an early intervention when non-serious problems arise. Additionally, Chinese researchers have conducted studies on the effectiveness of solution-focused therapy with some educated Asian families. Their result reveals that SFT strengthened family bonding and is based on multiculturalism. Furthermore, De Castro and Guterman conducted studies on the effectiveness of SFT with a group of family members with suicidal problems. They found that solution-focused therapy is a suitable model for families coping with suicide. The SFT approach allows the application of a variety of techniques and directs treatment to family members, thus promoting a cooperative approach. SFT has steadily established itself in research evidence and enjoys considerable empirical support. Similarities VS Dissimilarities in SFT and other theories The similarity in family therapy theories is that they all have the primary goal of restoring peace in families regardless of their preferred approach. However, solution-focused and narrative therapy are complementary because they are based on postmodern philosophy. Narrative and solution-focused therapists are trained to be client-centered, focusing on the solution and not the problem. The main difference between solution-focused therapists and other theories can be seen in their therapeutic roles. Solution-focused therapists are client-centered, offer hope, and are cheerleaders or coaches. On the other hand, psychoeducational therapists facilitate family learning management skills and maintain supportive partnerships withfamily. Cognitive/behavioral therapists are trainers and teachers.) While strategic family therapists are active, manipulative, and problem-focused, experiential therapists are egalitarian. Personal Reflections and Views on SFTI I carry out my daily and professional duties from a Christian worldview. And I see many similarities between some Bible verses and the solution-focused theoretical approach in family counseling. Therefore, I can easily identify with the assumptions and goals of solution-focused therapy. For example, SFT is simple and directs customers' attention to the solution rather than the problem. This concept refers to the Bible verse that encourages us to cast our burden on the Lord and He will sustain us and never allow this to happen. right to be shaken. In SFT clients are encouraged to put their problems aside, this will relate to another Bible verse that exalts us to look upon Jesus as the author and finisher of our faith; who, for the joy set before him, endured the cross, despising the infamy, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God. As a Christian counselor in training, I have found SFT to be a workable approach in family counseling. In my opinion this means that customers should be optimistic and not cry over spilled milk. This shows that this therapist will direct clients to forget the problem and hope for a better tomorrow, the Bible also tells us to persevere with the encouragement of God's words so we might have hope. Finally, since this Therapy is Brief, I believe my faith can be integrated with SFT into my practice for the effective treatment of my clients. Integrating SFT Principles and Techniques into Practice As a Christian therapist, I have found that solution-focused therapy is related to some Bible Verses and can help me in my counseling career to give hope to the hopeless in a short time. The principles and techniques of solution-focused therapy can be integrated into my Christian faith to carry out my professional duty. First, the fundamental principle of SFT is about positive change in the client's situation. When this is successful, the client achieves a cognitive change. This fundamental principle in solution-focused therapy points me to the Bible verse that says if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come, the old is gone, the new is here. Our faith in the Lord can lead to a change that will transform us into new creatures, just like clients who come to therapy seeking a better lifestyle. The second principle of solution-focused therapy that I can integrate into my counseling practice is that the therapist brings out the expectation that change will occur by setting the stage for dialogue. As Christians, our dialogue with the Lord can be described as a “resolution talk” just like SFT. Christians are children of God and they can talk to the Heavenly Father about their challenges and He will surely give the solution. Therefore, as a therapist, I am trained to listen and dialogue with my clients so that I can properly direct them to achieve a great outcome. Third, Steve de Shazer seems like a good Christian because of the metaphor used in the SFT approach. According to Shazer, the complaints that the counselor brings into session are like the locks on the door that could open to a more satisfying life, if only the skeleton key could be found. This is very important to me because, as a Christian, I believe that Jesus Christ is the master key to open all the locks to a better tomorrow..
tags