From the Middle Ages to the present day of the twenty-first century, women have been considered inferior to men. Virginia Woolf uses her essay to demonstrate the social acceptance of male dominance. Within the two different accounts of the two dinners, one at a men's college and the other at a women's college, the great difference in treatment, etiquette and dinner at both colleges emerges. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Virginia Woolf uses various structures in each article to describe segregation within the teaching framework so as to discover this piece of society. Woolf uses fewer adjectives and there is a clear difference in detail between the two passages. Step 1 was more descriptive and narrative while Step 2 was a basic description. The lunch is described as “invariably memorable” and was told using a series of complex compound sentences. By using these longer sentences, Woolf attempts to show the sense of superiority that has been given to men. They were treated with the utmost respect, as was their dinner. In the second step there are more monosyllabic words and much shorter, simpler sentences. Woolf opens this excerpt with “Here was my soup,” reinforcing her simple, disappointed tone. The simplicity of this sentence essentially represents the role of women in society. Women were treated as if they didn't matter. The meal that was served to women was essentially a mirror of how they were viewed in society. Woolf's use of simple sentences serves to describe discrimination against women and how women were not treated with the respect they deserved. Furthermore, the women's college meal is inert and unexciting. Virginia Woolf uses narrative structure, manipulation of language, selection of detail and tone to capture the atmosphere of meals. Woolf creates a meaningful message in the passages through the use of stylistic elements. The structures of both steps differ. At the men's college the meal is sumptuous and opulent. Woolf uses a parallel sentence structure to illustrate the best dishes prepared at the men's college. Woolf uses descriptive imagery when she refers to the potatoes served at the men's dinner as "thin as coins" and the sprouts "leaved like rosebuds but more succulent." ”. Men's food was depicted as immaculate in appearance. This image makes the men look like they are served like kings. Even the men's meals were presented with more respect than those at the Women's College. The women's meals were plain and bland. When Woolf states that "it is the nature of biscuits to be dry, and these were biscuits to the core," she insinuates that their dinner was not carefully prepared. Women were not served respectfully like queens. The meal served at the men's lunch was immaculate while the women's college had provided a meal that might as well have been equivalent to hospital food. Through the use of imagery in the two passages, Woolf highlights this subtle discrimination, not only within the education system but within society as a whole. The use of tone in these two passages demonstrates the fact that women continue to persevere. Woolf expresses the fact that women are reacting silently. He writes that "there was no reason to complain about the daily food of human nature, since the supply was sufficient." This shows that the food that men ate means that they receive high status, more power and more opportunities. On the other hand, the food that.