Topic > Gospel Study: The Concept of the Kingdom of God

IndexHistorical ContentLiterary ContextPassage AnalysisReflection and UpdateMark 9:1-8 tells much about the story of Jesus and the great thing he did and the symbolic meaning behind his garment when he was resurrected . He wore an intensely white robe that no one else could wear other than the son of God. Within this article I will go ahead and talk about the transfiguration of Jesus. I will use several pieces of information to connect all the information in the Bible. A discussion about Mark and learning the gospel with Mark will be an insightful light into what this gospel is trying to say. Also related to other theological themes of the Gospel and to some sections. Throughout the article I will use the attack on the areas of symbolism and bring light to this passage. Towards the end of the article I will talk about the topics and how these topics relate to the concept of the kingdom of God. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayHistorical ContentThrough my readings and discoveries through Achtemeier, the article takes many different turns. The article mentions that the author who wrote the gospel is not identified and that Mark is an interpreter of Peter. Many believe that the author of the book could have been the lucky son of a man named Mark. It sounds a little too good to be true, but many believe Mark carries a strong message. We tend to think that the author had to be male and not female, but given the lack of evidence and sources to support the information, a woman could have written these gospels just as easily as a man could. Although the identity of the author may not be known, there are several clues that may be based on the teachings and writings that she or he has shown in the Gospel, according to all of this. A couple of things are said in the passage that are not necessarily accurate. Sidon is south of Trye, the Sea of ​​Galilee is in the middle of the Decapolis, these are some of the main things to point out that weren't right. From the way the Gospel is written and the author is believed to have lived outside Palestine. This can be confirmed by the fact that the author originates from the writing technique and the message. Mark references Jewish customs and traditions to help the reader understand that the readers of the Gospel were outside Palestine. Mark has a strong purpose in writing the gospels, however it is not historically accurate. Mark's goal in writing the gospels was not to solve historical problems, he was rather trying to solve theological problems, all according to this. Many theologians find Mark's letters problematic because the letters are not in any kind of order and theologians look for things like that to make new discoveries and really dive deep into Mark's writings. Since Mark lacks thought about time or its representation, it can be concluded that Mark had no purpose in including it in the gospels. Mark talks about the rich history of its traditions and the history of the editorial team. Studying this has allowed theologians to broaden their reflection on the adult life of Jesus of Nazareth. The organization of Mark's gospel must indicate where the priorities of his overall account of Jesus are placed. This must also be understood in theological terms since Jesus is a strong and powerful figure. The writings of the gospel of Mark are written in theological terms and have much importance for history. During the narration we find other figures along the road, Peter, James and John were on a mountain and they see Elijah and Moses appear and they seem to think that for some reason they are talking to Jesus. Jesus continues with a conversation with Elijah andMoses, the conversation leads to several things but Elijah represents the prophets and Moses represents the law. Jesus has this conversation because he doesn't want to have it with just one prophet, he wants to have it with all his prophets according to Oden. These two men were not rich and they were not the brightest but they were important because they resisted tyrants. Elijah had only his sheepskin and little else and Moses had no possessions. These men didn't like or seem to think that the rich people they came from actually deserved or needed it. Elijah and Moses are embraced with love and kingdom for the Lord, the author feels that these two can lead people to Jesus. Returning to the three on the mountain Jesus took them up there to be isolated from everyone else. The main thing to understand from this is that this mountain is symbolic, meaning that Jesus took them there so that they would be alone and he could answer his message to them. Jesus is trying to decide who are the chosen few to make his wishes come true and he believes these are some of those people so he wants them isolated to hear his word. He doesn't want any distraction from anything, that's why the mountain is symbolic. Literary Context The book written by Strauss shows many key pieces of evidence and shows its sections. These sections are divided into three different ones. In the first section Jesus is the chosen one, he is the Messiah and the Son of God, the second section shows how he will fulfill these promises in more than one way, and the third section invites his supporters and believers to join the Messiah's path and of the Lord God. The main thing to take away from everything is that Jesus is the Messiah and the Son of God. Before the passage many things happen, Jesus speaks to his disciples about the sacrifices that the son of man must undergo punishment and suffer despite being rejected by elders and priests of all sorts, and be killed, after those three days he will rise again from the dead. People can't believe what they hear, but Jesus is basically telling them what will happen. After the passage, Jesus goes on to tell the three prophets that they must keep secret everything they know and not reveal that information to anyone. Jesus wants to show him this when he rises from the dead and proves that he is truly a son of God. A couple of key themes throughout Mark's gospel, such as the kingdom of God, discipleship, and Jesus. Looking back at the clouds and voices from heaven when the prophets were on the mountain may be a representation of the kingdom of God. Strauss then goes on to say that this has come closer because the king or kingdom of God is present. The importance of James, Peter, and John going up the mountain is critical because it states that true followers of Christ are willing to follow Him up that mountain and believe He has the answers. They show discipleship by always following Him even if they have not done so through suffering and death.Analysis of the PassageJ. Calvin explains “The revelation of heavenly glory which Christ began with the resurrection and then offered more fully when he sent the Holy Spirit and performed wonderful works of power.” This quote refers to Mark 9:1 and the story of the transfiguration. The kingdom of God gained power and notion when Jesus rose from the dead, this seems to be a common notion throughout the New Testament, according to which many others have different beliefs. A couple of things to take away from Jesus' resurrection is that Jesus is somewhat transformed when he resurrects, his white clothes creating the suspense that he has actually returned from the dead. Another thing to keep in mind is that those clouds represent the kingdom of God, so when we hear about the clouds above Jesus we are stating that the kingdom of God is with Jesus. In Mark 9:3 it talks about what Jesus wore and of the importance and meaning of his all-white attire. Gundry's comment states the.