Topic > Evaluating Plato's View of Democracy

The problem with evaluating Plato's view of democracy is that the Athenian meaning of the word "democracy" has nothing to do with modern ideals, the words themselves. The demoted demonstration means "party" in the Eastern sense of the ruling party system (minus the socialist doctrine: true Athenians believe in natural inequality, even by the standards of the time, and also in the divine rights and obligations of cunning enriched in everything), or even 'class' which derives from the verb daiomai, which means 'I separate, divide, choose, classify', choose outside, elect elite, does not reveal the idea, acceptance or vol bshtenie all, and does not mean the idea of ​​'person', which is then expressed by the word 'hao laos'. The word ho demo will have this broader meaning only much later in Greek history, especially in Rome and under the influence of the newborn Church, which thus indicated the baptized community. 'Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The only difference with the oligarchy is that the oligarchs are very small, the size of a sports team along with training staff, so they each know their names and identities, while in special classes democracy knows too much about its own identity, but it is very limited: it seems that the shareholders of a large building society that exists only to serve and exercise a kind of domination, are not prevented by some moral principles other than personal interest groups. This is an elite oligarchy like that of the Native Americans returning. The government calls the simple workers better called Laodikiy and there is a city in Asia Minor which uses that name and is managed that way, but this mode is not considered worthy of attention among the Greeks, who share all the general insults about how be philosophical about ALL schools, they can see what is known as typical Greek, and not only in the highlands: everyone has a general aversion to cabin workers and useful work, which excludes even the best scientists and craftsmen for occultists and mystics, and to the end of Greek scientific development led rapidly. in most Greek cities in terms of collective community interests, the Romans later called res publica, absent. Athens' political actions are defined as a set of selfish interests representing 2 or 3% of the adult male population of Attica and their dependence, nothing more and perhaps even less than recent archaeological discoveries. So democracy as an ideal model, symbolized by the words , not discussed or considered as a noteworthy object in all of Plato's work, beyond any discussion, cannot be accused of criticizing something he had never imagined. To criticize is as anachronistic as criticizing Jefferson for opposing Marxist socialism, although we can assume he would be horrified by the idea of ​​such denunciation. What Plato did not know about the form of democracy in Athens was that it was a mode in which privileges were not determined by nature of a positive character, such as concern for the truth, not only for personal gain, but fortunately inherited the right to decide, within the condominium, a form of ownership that gives the right to people only to have rights over other people and not to satisfy their own conditions and the right of the person with obligations. Plato's democracy is a natural outcome of oligarchic rule, if the oligarchy loses its original ambition to reform or structure society according to design (the Greek arches indicate the creative aspect of power, while kratos is only a rigid rule of)..