IndexCriminal casesSmart contractsNotarization and intellectual propertyThe future of Blockchain in lawOne of the advantages of blockchain technology is the opportunity to place a digital tag on objects and documents allowing movements to be tracked both physically and online. This feature opens up huge possibilities in joint work between blockchain and law, one of which is proof of service. For example, the court sends written instructions to a litigant when he or she is required to appear in court. In this process, a proof of service document is the affidavit to the court that the individual received. In general, companies that use process servers are known as process servers, and ServeManager is one of them. Earlier this year, ServeManager partnered with a blockchain company called IntegraLedger. Companies have focused on testing a proof of concept with the help of the IntegraLedger blockchain to ensure delivery of service documents and ultimately act as reliable proof that these documents have been delivered. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayCriminal CasesThe legal system could also benefit from blockchain by using it to improve the criminal justice system with a distributed ledger architecture. Therefore, law enforcement, prosecutors, courts, probation, defense attorneys, and correctional organizations would be able to access criminal charges shared and tracked in a registry. When charges are added or dropped, that information will also be recorded in the docket, resulting in quicker results and an overall more efficient administration of justice. Smart Contracts The legal industry relies heavily on legal documents, be they contracts between companies or statements from witnesses and victims. However, a document must be signed and filed for it to be binding, which is a time-consuming process that does not exclude human error. Blockchain technology could be the solution to this problem, incorporating accessibility to the documentation process and potentially even allowing the exclusion of a third party (a lawyer) from it. However, this shows how such a change could pose a threat to individual lawyers, while being beneficial to the industry on a large scale. Smart contracts often become the center of discussions regarding blockchain and law. There are several reasons why such contracts cannot currently replace a standard legal contract on their own. For example, sometimes new situations arise, but no one thought about it when negotiating the contract. However, blockchain is permanent, so modifying smart contracts that have not been programmed for further modification could be much more challenging than it currently is in the offline world. More importantly, a smart contract alone is only the execution of a particular agreement, not the agreement itself. Therefore, even if a smart contract executes the agreed upon terms, the contract itself still requires the involvement of a court lawyer. Notarization and Intellectual Property Overall, blockchain is capable of playing the same role as a notary since biometric data would allow for stronger authentication of a presence rather than the use of a private key that can be stolen. For example, BlockNotary uses blockchain for verifying and witnessing transactions and data as it offers “timestamps and fingerprints for media files”. However, none.