IndexThe decline in interest in political news among younger generationsThe impact of low youth turnout on political representationThe challenge of engaging young voters in campaigns policiesConclusionReferences Starting sometime before The United States of America was built, the early pioneers in Jamestown, Virginia, made it necessary to cast their voting form and make their voices heard. Voting has always been a key element of the American way; although many individuals have different feelings about whether voting is a community right, commitment, or obligation. In the book "The Youth Vote" by Martin P. Wattenberg it is convincingly argued that not only have young Americans in the twenty-first century withdrawn from government issues, but that this pattern is becoming increasingly common throughout the advanced universes. built voting-based systems. Martin Wattenberg goes on to say that: “Because so many young people do not follow politics and do not vote, parties and politicians often do not care about young people, thus further widening the age bias in electoral participation.” After reading this book, there were many times when I had to reflect on my political collaboration and ask myself if I fit into this distant group of young Americans. I will think more about the question of whether voting should be made compulsory as the purpose of this essay is not just to review the book, but to think critically about compulsory voting for young people. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay While reading this book I have taken advantage of my right to vote in the three presidential races since I turned eighteen, however, my support has not extended to using this privilege to vote in the vicinity. While I may not agree with the creator that America's youth are withdrawn from legislative issues, I would have to agree that most current young adults essentially do not follow the government issues and political pioneers that will tremendously influence their future. It could be argued that this lack of cooperation in government matters and the decline in daily newspaper reading coincide. Declining Interest in Political News Among Younger Generations Print newspapers delivered to the front door of many Americans every morning are gradually turning into a relic. of times gone by. What was seen as a valuable pastime is gradually being supplanted by a couple of glances through the features of a much-loved news site. In the Aging of Regular Newspaper Readers section, Wattenberg argues that this general model would do little if newspapers were replaced with a data source from which individuals could benefit. This lasting decline is shown in a diagram on page eleven which states that in 1957, 76% of Americans read the newspaper day after day; fast forward to 2004 and that number drops to 41%. Wattenberg continues to demonstrate that this model is American, but there is nevertheless a general decline in the reading of documents. The sources of this data are legitimate and demonstrate that the world is actually reading fewer documents, but these facts do not prove that this is a contributing factor to declining political investment among qualified young voters. Former President George W. Bush admitted that reading the newspaper was not part of his daily routine. Theredecrease in the number of people who do not read the newspaper daily spans different age groups, political parties and backgrounds. With the information presented, I agree with the author that more and more people get most of their news from online sources and this information is not in-depth, nor does it provide a significant amount of educational material. Not only are millions of people choosing not to open a newspaper to stay up-to-date on world events, but suppression of political news from local news stations is also on the rise. Cable television has had a major impact on world politics. The American people once had a very limited selection of political news to choose from. There were few channels available on television, so most Americans watched the same news broadcasts and there was little room for diverse shopping. With the evolution of cable television and the addition of streaming services; it has become very easy to simply tune in or change channels. In the chapter Network TV News is a Dying Dinosaur, Wattenberg argues that major news broadcasters have aimed their nightly news at older adults. On a randomly chosen night, CBS Nightly News showed advertisements for products such as Pepto-Bismol, Ambian and Exlax. Although nightly news programs provide programming aimed at seniors, nightly news programs provide very little actual news, according to a study by Columbia University's Project for Excellence in Journalism. Only 11% of news stories featured written and edited stories, news coverage was spotty and ignored many important aspects of the story. The author goes on to state that many young Americans choose to watch alternative forms of television instead of tuning into major political events. With so many young adults turning away from the evening news, American news has slowly transitioned to providing more entertainment and comedy news. This genre is known as “soft news”. TV programs like Dateline, Inside Edition and Extra provide very little real news but can hit important political events. This chapter is about the aging evening news audience and how younger audiences have chosen to isolate themselves from political television coverage. I agree with the author that this has transformed important political debates and topics from "water cooler" conversations to a topic that is rarely discussed. I also agree that this has had many effects on the amount of political information that younger generations are exposed to. With a lack of reading newspapers and choosing to tune out the evening news and other major news broadcasts, those in their 30s and under are described as "not asking anyone under 30 for political information." This point is supported by a study completed in May 2004 by the Pew Research Center. They asked a random sample of over 5,000 Americans how much they followed fourteen types of news. Out of a total of fourteen stories, there are four that the younger participants followed more closely; entertainment, sports, science and technology and finally culture and art. Political news is not in the top four. Wattengburg continues to provide facts about the growing education of today's youth. In the 1940s it was acceptable to receive only ten years of formal education. By today's standards the average American receives thirteen years of formal education. One might assume that as the level of education increases there would also be an increase in the level of political knowledge. This is simply not the case. The studies provided in this chapterthey continue to argue that young adults around the world are not engaged in today's politics. A study completed by The World Values ​​Survey concludes that 65% of older adults in established democracies follow politics in the news every day. Compare this to the fact that only 30% of young adults follow politics every day. Wattenburg closes this chapter by stating: we are what we follow. Today's young adults follow entertainment news more than political news. I agree with the author that today's young adults are more attuned to entertainment than political news. There is substantial evidence to support this claim. Unfortunately, I am guilty of choosing entertainment over politics. As a result of the lack of political knowledge displayed by today's young adults, there is also a lack of participation in local and national elections. The impact of low youth turnout on political representation Where have all the young voters gone? This is the question of the next chapter, and it is a great question to ask after the information presented in the first three chapters of this book. Voter participation nationwide is at an all-time low. Considering voting at the local level, these numbers are even worse. The author describes how political campaigns are aimed at older Americans. This is because younger Americans are less likely to participate and cast a vote for their favored candidate. Not only are younger voters less likely to vote, but making little to no effort to reach this group of voters only widens the gap. Young voters are even less likely to vote locally, and these are the policies that have the greatest impact on their daily lives. Wattenberg concludes this chapter by stating that lowering the voting age has little to do with decreasing voter participation and everything to do with lack of exposure to politics. This chapter provided compelling evidence that the older generation votes more than the younger generations. Again, I have to agree with the author that lowering the voting age has had minimal impact, but the lack of daily exposure to politics makes it difficult to understand the importance of political participation. Because voter participation is lacking, it is important to ask whether voting is still seen as a civic duty among young adults. For many Americans, voting is considered a civic duty, just as one might view jury service as the responsibility of another American citizen. The chapter Young Adults See Voting as a Civic Duty explores whether young adults believe voting is a civic duty. Findings from two studies conclude that young Americans are less likely to view voting as a civic duty. This notion is seen across cultural lines. Less than 10% of respondents in Great Britain, Italy and Japan consider voting a civic duty. The conclusion of this chapter asks whether these findings are a glimpse into the future of political participation for the world as a whole. The author states that due to the lack of civic responsibility, these voters may be lost for life. However, he goes on to suggest that there are ways to convince citizens that their vote matters. The lack of participation is clearly demonstrated in this chapter and I agree that we, as citizens, should do more to cast our vote. I also agree that with age and maturity there are ways to convince the citizens of the world that their votes make a difference. However, taking inConsidering the fact that the majority of young adults do not take voting seriously, the question arises: could the results of local and national elections have a different outcome if every eligible voter cast their vote. ? I agree with the author, yes, low youth participation matters. What a person deems important politically often changes from their twenties to their early fifties. The beginning of this chapter states that young adults often have more socialist political views than older Americans. If these young adults don't vote, politicians will focus their electoral strategies on citizens who do vote. The goal of political campaigns is to get elected and then re-elected. Therefore, young adults are not represented politically. In a study completed by the Pew Research Center, young adults are more likely to face challenges related to finding a job and paying for college. In contrast, they are less likely to trade stocks and bonds and own a small business. The results of this study show that opinions are extremely different between different ages and that younger Americans may be more likely to vote for policies of government intervention in the economy. The National Annenberg Election Study concludes that young adults are more likely to vote for policies that include more spending on education and less money for America's military and armaments. With young American voters, this nation could continue down a path that would lead to “government by the elderly, by the elderly and for the elderly.” It has been proven that young adults are not exercising their right to vote, but they are exercising their freedom to volunteer. The challenge of involving young voters in political campaigns There is a new civic engagement among young people. The choice to volunteer in one's local community is on the rise among this generation of young adults. This chapter asks whether this new focus on political participation can offset the lack of voter turnout. It is stated that the increase in the number of volunteers may be due to the fact that volunteering looks good in college enrollments. A study completed by Monitoring the Future National Surveys concludes that students with higher grades and students who have a plan for college success are more likely to volunteer. Wattenberg then provides another study completed by the Harvard Institute of Politics that states that 85% of college students believe that “community volunteering is better than political engagement in addressing issues facing the community.” Even as interest in voting continues to decline, network support, outreach to political delegates, and the search for a way to make change are at an all-time high. In any case, I agree with the creator that together for the voices of young people to be heard legislators must strive to effectively involve young adults. Youth work in the 2008 and 2010 decisions was at a record-breaking high. President Obama took advantage of the enthusiasm of young voters and activated armies of young volunteers. The 2008 presidential campaign was the first of its kind, as the Internet was an important source of correspondence reaching younger adults. An exploratory study conducted by the Pew Research Center highlighted that there has been a huge development in the use of the Internet in the battle compared to 2004. Indeed, despite the large number of political volunteers, the 2008 political decision did not attract enough attention from young voters. to tune in topolitical discussions, and young voters were minimally likely to take part in telephone reviews of the political battle. For every 100 elderly residents, Obama's fight produced 94 voter contacts. Compared to every 100 young people, only 29 contacts were made. The end of this part paints a boring picture for what is considered the time of young voters. Even though voter investment has been at an unmatched level among young adults, that age statistic is still believed to have the lowest number of active voters. The proof shown in this section is stated unambiguously. Remembering the decisions of 2008 and 2010 evokes memories of political energy in me. I agree that these years have been the long hauls of young voters. After investigating the set of factors that contribute to young adults' lack of cooperation in legislative matters, an answer is needed. In this part Wattenberg states that he accepts that the necessary democracy is the main alternative. However, I unequivocally cannot help but contradict this agreement. The United States of America was born through opportunity. I do not accept that the legislator forces a resident to make his choice. I accept the obligation to vote in a city, an obligation which I intend to exercise for the rest of my years. Getting people to vote on something couldn't care less about getting them to make arbitrary withdrawals, like they would lottery numbers. Although the creator accepts that a high voter turnout would ensure that all voices are heard. The facts show that all voices would be heard, regardless of whether they are imprudent voices. In other words, I neither agree nor believe that it is in anyone's interest to force society, especially young people, to vote for someone or something they do not solemnly believe in. This may be precisely the reason why the percentage of young people and teenagers voting has decreased and decreases, because they are being pushed away. Conclusion In conclusion, the book 'Vote for Young People' provides a distinctive and elegantly composed investigation of the problems created by the absence of support among young voters. I have consistently accepted and embraced the fact that voting is and has consistently been a central element of the American way. This book has provided the necessary evidence and sufficient supporting examples to support the council's issues which are a consequence of the absence of political intrigue and information in younger adult statistics. While I disagree with the writer regarding his answers, he made a compelling statement and provided a book that contained valid references and opened up my perspective on what is extremely significant regarding my political interest. All in all, the ideas mentioned at the end of his text are a good starting point for addressing the many issues that result from the lack of political involvement of younger voters. The need for the government to impose pressure on voters who are simply not interested in political issues becomes questionable and as Watternberg expresses: “The answer to the question posed by the title of this book – 'Voting for young people? it certainly should be, but too often it isn't. Nonetheless, my overall assessment of “Vote for Youth” is that it was very encouraging. I knew how low voter turnout was among young people in the United States, but I had no idea that the global world shared this problem. Except for countries with compulsory voting, numerous countries share a democratic situation comparable to that of the United States. The fact that today such a number, 45(2), 183-201.