The Israeli-Palestinian conflict was a constant struggle between the Arab and Jewish populations for the creation of the State of Israel. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been going on for many years, there have been a variety of options that could potentially help resolve this conflict. However, the options that may be provided may not be consistent. With each solution both sides questioned the security of the borders and the protection of both the Arab and Jewish populations. There have been many attempts to resolve the conflict and so far all attempts have failed. In this article I will argue that Segal's two-state one-homeland solution can resolve the conflict between Israel and Palestine. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict stems from the Zionist population. The Zionist wanted to colonize a piece of land that could be considered the Jewish homeland. As they migrated to different parts of Europe, they eventually landed in Palestine. At first, the immigration of Zionists was not a problem for the people already living in Palestine. But problems arose because the Zionists decided to take over Palestine and transform it into a Jewish state. As the years passed and the wars continued, most of Palestine was conquered by Israel. And as a result of wars, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has remained prevalent throughout history. Segal's two-state, one-homeland solution is the best way to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Both the Jewish and Arab populations will have their own political constructs, but the single homeland means they will not have to divide historical sites within their state. The two-state proposal will help end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict… halfway through the document… explains that there should be fair equality of opportunity for all involved. This principle can be applied to conflict because to achieve peace, both sides must have the opportunity to achieve equality. Rawl's statement supports my thesis that Segal's solution resolves the conflict between Israel and Palestine. This principle connects to Segal's solution because having two states and one homeland means having the opportunity to structure their state however they like and the opportunity to remain in the same region where their homeland is located. Rawl's statement strengthens the argument because his theory is based on fundamental rights for all and equality of opportunity for all. The idea of ​​equal opportunity relates to conflict because to reach an agreement both sides must be willing to compromise to make everything equal for states.