The reform of the House of Lords has been discussed for a long time, it has been more than 100 years since the parliamentary law was passed. In 1910 the House of Lords was angry when the Peers rejected the Liberal government's budget. According to the chronology of House of Lords reforms, the first reform occurred in 1911 and 1949, when laws were introduced that significantly diminished the powers of the House of Lords. The second reading of the House of Lords reform bill took place on 9 July 2012 and 100 Conservative MPs were unhappy with the bill. They said this would lead to greater friction between the amended House of Lords and the Commons. Reforming the House of Lords would solve some problems, as well as cause problems. If the House of Lords were reformed so that there was a 50/50 split between nominated and elected peers, the 50 elected peers would present an element of democracy to the House. While the 50 nominated colleagues would have an area of ​​expertise to bring to the Chamber. On the other hand, we would lose more experienced and recognized experts in various fields. If the peers were to be appointed in their own right, it would be cheaper than holding elections since it is not known how often elections will be held, and removing the 92 hereditary peers would be a bad idea since they know and understand a lot about laws and control the laws from a long time and the new peers would have no experience with the law. Reforming the House of Lords would solve more problems due to the fact that it would make the house more representative. Ethnic minorities currently make up a small percentage in the home. Also they are little women in the house, so having more women who know what real life is like and who... I'm middle of paper... entering the House of Lords would solve more problems than it would cause in the sense that the The goal is to make the house more representative and at the same time reduce the amount of money spent on food, accommodation and the money that peers receive every time they sit in the house. The system will be strong bicameral similar to the US one and the parliament will be more democratic. There may be peers who want to resign but cannot, so reforming the house would give the opportunity to those who are willing to resign because they are tired and want to rest, they may be tired of doing the same thing all their life, and after the reform when a colleague does not carry out the work as he should, he can be expelled. The House of Commons would share all responsibilities with the Lords as they don't have much time now that they are the only ones elected.