The topic of global warming has been widely politicized. As a result, whether global warming is really a myth or a reality depends largely on where you stand on your opinion. The reasoning has been and continues to be the fruit of controversies in global warming debates because computer systems and models, among other technologies, have been of little help in providing a definitive solution to these debates. A great rift has arisen between scientists and other social thinkers. Regardless of which side the argument is made, the end result is that the world today is experiencing global warming and anyone who refutes this is simply taking the politics of this issue to another level. Scientists are of the opinion that issues of global warming cannot be based on mere consensus. In addition to this, they also argue that to date there is not a single experiment that can state with certainty that the effect of global warming is actually taking place. In this sense, their claims remain very true because even existing models and computer models differ greatly from what is actually happening. For example, in establishing temperature variations, it turns out that the experiments conducted do not have the sufficiency required by the fundamental rules of science. Naturally, world temperatures are strongly influenced by ocean currents. Despite this, almost 90% of all temperature measuring instruments are placed on dry ground. This leads to the question of how useful such information is because according to science the real thing hasn't been measured. The difficulty that exists in measuring temperatures in ocean currents has not been well understood and therefore, according to the scientists' argument... half of the article... we are experiencing new meteorological conditions. In conclusion, global warming is a reality problem, which cannot be refuted in any way. There is more evidence to support this than anyone would like. The main factor contributing to global warming has been the emission of greenhouse gases, mainly carbon dioxide. Therefore, regardless of whether there is concrete scientific evidence or whether this occurs through consensus, the effects of global warming remain real, and the effects are gradually taking a new form every day. Current technology may not be enough to give empirical credence to the reality of global warming, as scientists may want, but that will not change the reality of global warming in any way because the effects are building. In the days to come, technological progress will only confirm the reality of global warming and not vice versa.